These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
285 related items for PubMed ID: 33213716
1. Guided Implant Surgery: A Technique Whose Time Has Come. Chen P, Nikoyan L. Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 65(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 33213716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. Kernen F, Kramer J, Wanner L, Wismeijer D, Nelson K, Flügge T. BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep 10; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 32912273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter? Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP, Dennhardt A, Schullian P, Reto B, Puelacher W. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Sep 10; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S, Staffen A, Yeung M, Whitley D, Laskin DM, Deeb GR. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul 10; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning. Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Sadeghpour M, Revilla-León M. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar 10; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct 10; 66(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 25123770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and tomographic comparison of dental implants placed by guided virtual surgery versus conventional technique: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Magrin GL, Rafael SNF, Passoni BB, Magini RS, Benfatti CAM, Gruber R, Peruzzo DC. J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Jan 10; 47(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 31628873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery. Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov 10; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery. Flügge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, Metzger MC. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug 10; 71(8):1340-6. PubMed ID: 23866950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case Report. Mandelaris GA, Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS. Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Oct 10; 39(9):614-621; quiz 622. PubMed ID: 30299111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study. Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S. J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun 10; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. J Periodontol; 2010 Jan 10; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL. Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Jan 10; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery. Gjelvold B, Mahmood DJH, Wennerberg A. J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar 10; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides. Cunha RM, Souza FÁ, Hadad H, Poli PP, Maiorana C, Carvalho PSP. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 10; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging-Proof of principle. Flügge T, Ludwig U, Hövener JB, Kohal R, Wismeijer D, Nelson K. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun 10; 31(6):575-583. PubMed ID: 32105363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of a partially guided system using an in-office 3D-printed surgical guide for implant placement. Cho JY, Kim SB, Ryu J. Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb 26; 24(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 34006060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Ganz SD. Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr 26; 59(2):265-90. PubMed ID: 25835793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, Ellingsen JE. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Apr 26; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]