These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

406 related items for PubMed ID: 3321498

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detectability of artificial marginal bone lesions as a function of lesion depth. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
    Gröndahl K, Kullendorff B, Strid KG, Gröndahl HG, Henrikson CO.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 3280612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van Aken J.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions.
    Kullendorff B, Gröndahl K, Rohlin M, Nilsson M.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Examiner agreement in estimating changes in periodontal bone from conventional and subtraction radiographs.
    Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG, Wennström J, Heijl L.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 14(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 3546401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study.
    Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Jan; 15(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 3276740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR, Araujo NS, Bowie J, Sallum EA, Jeffcoat MK.
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-based reconstruction and temporal subtraction of radiographs.
    Ruttimann UE.
    Adv Dent Res; 1987 Oct; 1(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 3326619
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.