These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 33231200

  • 61. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C.
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM-BASED EVALUATION.
    Hadjiconstanti AC, Messaris GAT, Thomopoulos KC, Solomou AG, Panayiotakis GS.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun 01; 175(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 27664432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS, Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Hoffmann KR.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 01; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL, Xu T, Molloi S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan 07; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Characterizing a novel scintillating glass for application to megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hu YH, Shedlock D, Wang A, Rottmann J, Baturin P, Myronakis M, Huber P, Fueglistaller R, Shi M, Morf D, Star-Lack J, Berbeco RI.
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar 07; 46(3):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30586163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.
    Wiesinger B, Stütz A, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr 07; 198(4):946-54. PubMed ID: 22451565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A, Padovani R, Quai E, Vano E, Prieto C, Aviles P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Apr 07; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A, Dance DR, Workman A, Yip M, Wells K, Young KC.
    Med Phys; 2012 May 07; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Entrance surface air kerma in X-ray systems for paediatric interventional cardiology: a national survey.
    Ubeda C, Vano E, Miranda P, Valenzuela E, Vergara F, Guarda E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul 07; 165(1-4):107-10. PubMed ID: 25805885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Multisource inverse-geometry CT. Part I. System concept and development.
    De Man B, Uribe J, Baek J, Harrison D, Yin Z, Longtin R, Roy J, Waters B, Wilson C, Short J, Inzinna L, Reynolds J, Neculaes VB, Frutschy K, Senzig B, Pelc N.
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug 07; 43(8):4607. PubMed ID: 27487877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.
    Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Chen L, Altunbas MC, Liu X, Han T, Wang T, Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Tu SJ.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul 07; 34(7):2995-3004. PubMed ID: 17822008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Image Quality Performance of Virtual Single-Source CT Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
    Alikhani B, Werner M, Jamali L, Wacker F, Werncke T.
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug 07; 26(8):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30482627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Tzedakis A, Papadakis A, Theocharopoulos N, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov 07; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
    Nocetti D, Ubeda C, Calcagno S, Acevedo J, Pardo D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul 07; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Fast analytical approach of application specific dose efficient spectrum selection for diagnostic CT imaging and PET attenuation correction.
    Rui X, Jin Y, FitzGerald PF, Wu M, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, De Man B.
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov 07; 61(21):7787-7811. PubMed ID: 27754977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.