These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 33242678

  • 1. Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.
    Engels V, Medina M, Antolín E, Ros C, Amaro A, De-Guirior C, Manzour N, Sotillo L, De la Cuesta R, Rodríguez R, San-Frutos L, Peralta S, Martin-Martínez A, Alcázar JL.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102004. PubMed ID: 33242678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C, Pizzo A, Lazzeri L, Pietropolli A, Piccione E, Zupi E.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 May; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, Kleiman-Broeze KA, Traas MAF, Muijsers GJJM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, van Oostwaard MF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Peters HE, Lier MCI, Lambalk CB, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May 09; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution.
    Piccioni MG, Riganelli L, Filippi V, Fuggetta E, Colagiovanni V, Imperiale L, Caccetta J, Panici PB, Porpora MG.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Feb 09; 45(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 27753111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B, Lazzeri L, Franchini M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Nappi C, Piccione E, Exacoustos C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan 09; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): Tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure.
    Tanaka K, Chua J, Cincotta R, Ballard EL, Duncombe G.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb 09; 58(1):114-118. PubMed ID: 28949014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
    Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, Boes AS, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar 09; 45(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 25092501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH, van Vliet M, Weber M, Exalto N.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan 09; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography for assessment of fallopian tube patency in infertile women.
    Le MT, Vo BH, Le HP, Pham AP, Vu AL, Pham TD, Truong TT, Ho TM, Dang VQ.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2024 Sep 09; 49(3):104112. PubMed ID: 39013260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Automated three-dimensional coded contrast imaging hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: feasibility in office tubal patency testing.
    Exacoustos C, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Romeo V, Romanini ME, Luciano D, Zupi E, Arduini D.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar 09; 41(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 22648792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL, Jung JJ, Yu SL, Rajesh H.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec 09; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P, Pitynski K.
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr 01; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Apr 01; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.
    Robertshaw IM, Sroga JM, Batcheller AE, Martinez AM, Winter TC, Sinning K, Maxwell R, Lindheim SR.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun 01; 35(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27126400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does hysterosalpingo-foam sonography have any therapeutic effect? A systematic review.
    Piccioni MG, Tabacco S, Merlino L, Del Negro V, Mazzeo A, Logoteta A, Del Prete F, Riganelli L, Giannini A, Monti M.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2020 Feb 01; 72(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 32153165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis following hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy).
    Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Szczeklik W, Martins WP.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec 01; 54(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 31219636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, van Baal WM, Traas MAF, van Peperstraten AM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, Lambeek AF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Tros R, Lambalk CB, Stoker J, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May 03; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pain Intensity During Ultrasound Assessment of Uterine Cavity and Tubal Patency With and Without Painkillers: Prospective Observational Study.
    Ludwin I, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin A.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 May 03; 24(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 28159714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Spontaneous pregnancy rates in infertile women after sequential hydrosonography and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
    Melcer Y, Shamir-Kaholi N, Vainer-Rotbart S, Pekar-Zlotin M, Youngster M, Gat I, Maymon R.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr 03; 271():219-222. PubMed ID: 35231747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.