These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


115 related items for PubMed ID: 33290308

  • 1. Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Wakayama A, Nomoto H, Chiba Y, Matsumoto C, Kusaka S.
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Jan 01; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 33290308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Central Visual Field Sensitivity With and Without Background Light Given to the Nontested Fellow Eye in Glaucoma Patients.
    Mine I, Shoji T, Kumagai T, Yoshikawa Y, Kosaka A, Shinoda K.
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Jun 01; 30(6):537-544. PubMed ID: 33350657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T, Shoji T, Yoshikawa Y, Mine I, Kanno J, Ishii H, Saito A, Ishikawa S, Kimura I, Shinoda K.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov 01; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.
    Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Ayato Y, Shimomura Y.
    PLoS One; 2019 Nov 01; 14(1):e0210691. PubMed ID: 30653560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.
    Matsumoto C, Yamao S, Nomoto H, Takada S, Okuyama S, Kimura S, Yamanaka K, Aihara M, Shimomura Y.
    PLoS One; 2016 Nov 01; 11(8):e0161974. PubMed ID: 27564382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Test-retest repeatability of the imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test in patients with glaucoma.
    Toyokuni H, Sakamoto M, Ueda K, Kurimoto T, Yamada-Nakanishi Y, Nakamura M.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep 01; 67(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 37392238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
    Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 01; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
    Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul 01; 41(8):2212-21. PubMed ID: 10892865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Ishii M, Seki M, Harigai R, Abe H, Fukuchi T.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov 01; 117(11):925-30. PubMed ID: 24397190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS, Shin JH, Park IK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan 06; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Relationship Between Binocular Visual Field Loss and Various Stages of Monocular Visual Field Damage in Glaucoma Patients.
    Xu J, Lu P, Dai M, Huang W, Lin J, Huang J.
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Jan 06; 28(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 30300303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Study on the difference of binocular accommodative response between atients with intermittent exotropia under different viewing condition].
    Shen PC, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Jiang J, Xu JJ, Lin HL, Xu D.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan 11; 54(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 29429288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H, Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Klistorner A, Billson FA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct 11; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients.
    Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Abe H.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov 11; 249(11):1721-7. PubMed ID: 21858466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations.
    Musch DC, Niziol LM, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, Janz NK.
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul 11; 124(7):1031-1038. PubMed ID: 28408039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Agreement in the detection of chiasmal and postchiasmal visual field defects between imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test.
    Sakamoto M, Sawamura H, Aihara M, Goseki T, Ikeda T, Ishikawa H, Nakamura M.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep 11; 66(5):413-424. PubMed ID: 35972588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.
    Sugisaki K, Asaoka R, Inoue T, Yoshikawa K, Kanamori A, Yamazaki Y, Ishikawa S, Nemoto H, Iwase A, Araie M.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 May 11; 104(5):642-647. PubMed ID: 31481390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kimura T, Matsumoto C, Nomoto H.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019 May 11; 13():501-513. PubMed ID: 30936681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Binocular Disparity Selectivity Weakened after Monocular Deprivation in Mouse V1.
    Scholl B, Pattadkal JJ, Priebe NJ.
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul 05; 37(27):6517-6526. PubMed ID: 28576937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma.
    Ishibashi M, Matsumoto C, Hashimoto S, Eura M, Okuyama S, Nomoto H, Tanabe F, Kayazawa T, Numata T, Kusaka S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov 05; 103(11):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 30636206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.