These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 33298388

  • 1. Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions.
    Civak T, Ustun T, Yilmaz HN, Gursoy B.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan; 49(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 33298388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
    Genç BGÇ, Orhan K, Or S.
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2023 Jun; 41(6):283-290. PubMed ID: 37335617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Is the Er: YAG Laser Effective in Reducing Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars? A Meta-Analysis.
    Sales PHDH, Barros AWP, Silva PGB, Vescovi P, Leão JC.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar; 80(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 34793714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.
    Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery.
    Menziletoglu D, Basturk F, Isik BK, Esen A.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar 01; 24(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 31811604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct 01; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Conventional drilling versus ultrasound and laser osteotomy in mandibular third molar surgery: A comparative study.
    Blagova B, Krastev D, Malinova L.
    Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Dec 01; 55(10):862-870. PubMed ID: 37811576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on impacted mandibular third molar surgery outcomes.
    Uyanık LO, Bilginaylar K, Etikan İ.
    Head Face Med; 2015 Jul 26; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26209242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of ımpacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional ınstruments: a split-mouth clinical ınvestigation.
    Erdem MK, Cambazoglu M.
    Eur J Med Res; 2024 Sep 14; 29(1):460. PubMed ID: 39272144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nd:YAG laser therapy on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized double-blinded clinical study.
    Han Y, Zhu J, Hu S, Li C, Zhang X.
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Aug 05; 38(1):176. PubMed ID: 37541966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children.
    Yang L, Chen Y, Fang W.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun 05; 80(6):1078-1083. PubMed ID: 35300957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on outcomes after removal of ımpacted mandibular third molars.
    Bilginaylar K, Uyanik LO.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul 05; 54(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 27044941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of piezo-electric vs conventional drilling bur surgery of impacted lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial.
    Caputo A, Rubino E, Marcianò A, Peditto M, Bellocchio AM, Nucera R, Oteri G.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr 21; 23(1):233. PubMed ID: 37085833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.