These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
155 related items for PubMed ID: 33299296
1. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Nazareth T, Rocha J, Scoralick ALB, Dias DT, Gracitelli CPB, Kanadani FN, Prata TS. Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study. Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA. Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022 Mar; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Severity Indices. Kang EM, Hong S, Kim CY, Seong GJ. Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 26240511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Iester M, Capris P, Altieri M, Zingirian M, Traverso CE. Int Ophthalmol; 1999 Aug; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients. Morbio R, Longo C, De Vitto AML, Comacchio F, Della Porta LB, Marchini G. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of optical coherence tomography in glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive and normal eyes. Subbiah S, Sankarnarayanan S, Thomas PA, Nelson Jesudasan CA. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 55(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 17595477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the TEMPO Binocular Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Nishida T, Weinreb R, Arias J, Vasile C, Moghimi S. Res Sq; 2023 Aug 29. PubMed ID: 37693597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct 29; 91(10):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17389740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between visual field changes and optical coherence tomography measurements in advanced open-angle glaucoma. Kostianeva SS, Konareva-Kostianeva MI, Atanassov MA. Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2016 Sep 01; 58(3):174-181. PubMed ID: 27760009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes. Nakai Y, Bessho K, Shono Y, Taoka K, Nakai Y. Int J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep 01; 14(12):1882-1887. PubMed ID: 34926203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of frequency-doubling perimetry with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects. Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Ichhpujani P, Gupta A. J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug 01; 20(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 20717056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Bowd C, Hao J, Tavares IM, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Lee TW, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Goldbaum MH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 01; 49(3):945-53. PubMed ID: 18326717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-function relationships between spectral-domain OCT and standard achromatic perimetry. Nilforushan N, Nassiri N, Moghimi S, Law SK, Giaconi J, Coleman AL, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May 09; 53(6):2740-8. PubMed ID: 22447869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]