These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 33339784

  • 1. Evaluation of fouling and RO performance for MBR treated fruit wastewater.
    Jamal-Uddin AT, Zytner RG.
    Water Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 82(11):2282-2295. PubMed ID: 33339784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
    Farias EL, Howe KJ, Thomson BM.
    Water Res; 2014 Feb 01; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
    Luo W, Phan HV, Xie M, Hai FI, Price WE, Elimelech M, Nghiem LD.
    Water Res; 2017 Feb 01; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Integration of an anaerobic fluidized-bed membrane bioreactor (MBR) with zeolite adsorption and reverse osmosis (RO) for municipal wastewater reclamation: Comparison with an anoxic-aerobic MBR coupled with RO.
    Li Y, Sim LN, Ho JS, Chong TH, Wu B, Liu Y.
    Chemosphere; 2020 Apr 01; 245():125569. PubMed ID: 31864040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR, Wilf M, Andes K, Iong J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Apr 01; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pretreatment for alleviation of RO membrane fouling in dyeing wastewater reclamation.
    Chen GQ, Wu YH, Tan YJ, Chen Z, Tong X, Bai Y, Luo LW, Wang HB, Xu YQ, Zhang ZW, Ikuno N, Hu HY.
    Chemosphere; 2022 Apr 01; 292():133471. PubMed ID: 34974050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW, Choi IH, Lee SH, Kim IC, Lee KH.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Apr 01; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Spatial and temporal evolution of organic foulant layers on reverse osmosis membranes in wastewater reuse applications.
    Farias EL, Howe KJ, Thomson BM.
    Water Res; 2014 Jul 01; 58():102-10. PubMed ID: 24747141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Utilization of reverse osmosis (RO) for reuse of MBR-treated wastewater in irrigation-preliminary tests and quality analysis of product water.
    Bunani S, Yörükoğlu E, Sert G, Kabay N, Yüksel Ü, Yüksel M, Egemen Ö, Pek TÖ.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb 01; 25(4):3030-3037. PubMed ID: 25689918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M, Ates A, Inanc B.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Feb 01; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.