These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 33350841

  • 1. Use of CBCT and Low-Cost Additive Manufacturing in Implant Surgical Guide Fabrication.
    Apostolakis D, Michelinakis G.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Nov; 41(10):514-519; quiz 520. PubMed ID: 33350841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Sadeghpour M, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Mar; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery.
    Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A retrospective study of the accuracy of template-guided versus freehand implant placement: A nonradiologic method.
    Alevizakos V, Mitov G, Stoetzer M, von See C.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 128(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31227455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: A cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols.
    Abduo J, Lau D.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):361-372. PubMed ID: 33817957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J, Liu X, Schweyen R, Setz J, Pan S, Liu J, Zhou Y.
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct 21; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Guided Implant Surgery: A Technique Whose Time Has Come.
    Chen P, Nikoyan L.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jan 21; 65(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 33213716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP, Dennhardt A, Schullian P, Reto B, Puelacher W.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Jan 21; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov 21; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ku JK, Lee J, Lee HJ, Yun PY, Kim YK.
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jan 16; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 35034613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radiographic Evaluation of Prosthodontic Patients.
    Anadioti E, Kohltfarber H.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jul 16; 65(3):605-621. PubMed ID: 34051932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study.
    Jaemsuwan S, Arunjaroensuk S, Kaboosaya B, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb 16; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr 16; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
    Bencharit S, Staffen A, Yeung M, Whitley D, Laskin DM, Deeb GR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul 16; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.
    Flügge T, Ludwig U, Winter G, Amrein P, Kernen F, Nelson K.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Aug 16; 31(8):737-746. PubMed ID: 32459868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-Aided Planning and Placement in Implant Surgery.
    Deeb GR, Tran DQ, Deeb JG.
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Sep 16; 28(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 32741514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.