These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 33357983

  • 1. Batch mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of spent goat batch mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of spent goat straw bedding and goat cheese whey: Comparison with the mono-digestion of the two sole substrates.
    Fernández-Rodríguez MJ, Puntano NF, Mancilla-Leytón JM, Borja R.
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb 15; 280():111733. PubMed ID: 33357983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of several types of spent livestock bedding in a batch leach-bed reactor: substrate characterization and process performance.
    Riggio S, Torrijos M, Debord R, Esposito G, van Hullebusch ED, Steyer JP, Escudié R.
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan 15; 59():129-139. PubMed ID: 27836514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and septage: Effect of substrate and inoculum on biogas production.
    Bella K, Venkateswara Rao P.
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr 15; 308():114581. PubMed ID: 35124319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In situ biogas upgrading and enhancement of anaerobic digestion of cheese whey by addition of scrap or powder zero-valent iron (ZVI).
    Charalambous P, Vyrides I.
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb 15; 280():111651. PubMed ID: 33221048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Techno-economic feasibility of anaerobic digestion of cheese whey in small Italian dairies and effect of ultrasound pre-treatment on methane yield.
    Mainardis M, Flaibani S, Trigatti M, Goi D.
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep 15; 246():557-563. PubMed ID: 31202020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Techno-economic assessment of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure and cheese whey (Cow, Goat & Sheep) at small to medium dairy farms.
    Mostafa Imeni S, Pelaz L, Corchado-Lopo C, Maria Busquets A, Ponsá S, Colón J.
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Nov 15; 291():121872. PubMed ID: 31377516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomethane recovery through co-digestion of cheese whey and glycerol in a two-stage anaerobic fluidized bed reactor: Effect of temperature and organic loading rate on methanogenesis.
    Almeida PS, de Menezes CA, Camargo FP, Sakamoto IK, Lovato G, Rodrigues JAD, Varesche MBA, Silva EL.
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar 15; 330():117117. PubMed ID: 36584460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds with different waste feedstocks for biogas production.
    Kim J, Kim H, Baek G, Lee C.
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb 15; 60():322-328. PubMed ID: 27751681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spent cow bedding in leach-bed reactors.
    Riggio S, Hernandéz-Shek MA, Torrijos M, Vives G, Esposito G, van Hullebusch ED, Steyer JP, Escudié R.
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jun 15; 234():466-471. PubMed ID: 28336219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and the screened liquid fraction of dairy manure in a single continuously stirred tank reactor process: Limits in co-substrate ratios and organic loading rate.
    Rico C, Muñoz N, Rico JL.
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jun 15; 189():327-333. PubMed ID: 25911592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Substrate-to-inoculum ratio drives solid-state anaerobic digestion of unamended grape marc and cheese whey.
    Kassongo J, Shahsavari E, Ball AS.
    PLoS One; 2022 Jun 15; 17(1):e0262940. PubMed ID: 35085345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Continuous anaerobic co-digestion of Ulva biomass and cheese whey at varying substrate mixing ratios: Different responses in two reactors with different operating regimes.
    Jung H, Kim J, Lee C.
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Dec 15; 221():366-374. PubMed ID: 27660988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models.
    Kafle GK, Chen L.
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb 15; 48():492-502. PubMed ID: 26531046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.