These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 33364213

  • 1. Efficacy of Periapical Radiography and Three Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Systems for Detection of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: An in- Vitro Study.
    V A, A E, S S, M R J, Gholi Mezerji N M.
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2020 Dec; 10(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 33364213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
    Eskandarloo A, Saati S, Ardakani MP, Jamalpour M, Gholi Mezerji NM, Akheshteh V.
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Dec; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
    Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, de Oliveira Sales MA, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Dec; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F, Jamalpour MR, Eskandarloo A, Tapak L, Rahimi N.
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS, Gaweesh YSE, Taalab MR, El Sadat SA.
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec 17; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of peri-implant bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography with parallel and oblique projection.
    Vadiati Saberi B, Khosravifard N, Ghandari F, Hadinezhad A.
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec 17; 49(4):265-272. PubMed ID: 31915611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun 17; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T, Juerchott A, Deisenhofer UK, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Schwindling FS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep 17; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
    Song D, Shujaat S, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Huang Y, Politis C, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R.
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb 10; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified gray-scale range versus digital periapical radiography for the assessment of bone-implant interface gaps.
    Kajan ZD, Abbasi S, Khosravifard N, Sigaroudi AK, Motevasseli S.
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jan 10; 38(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33893899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Validity of digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant bone defects: in vitro study].
    Elera Morales CC, Castro Ruiz CT.
    Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2023 Jan 10; 11(1):e141. PubMed ID: 38288316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.
    Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, Augusto de Oliveira Sales M, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, Cavalcanti MG.
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct 10; 86(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 26156676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection.
    Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Dec 10; 38(8):531-6. PubMed ID: 20026710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intra- and inter-observer agreements in detecting peri-implant bone defects between periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study.
    Zhang CN, Zhu Y, Fan LF, Zhang X, Jiang YH, Gu YX.
    J Dent Sci; 2021 Jul 10; 16(3):948-956. PubMed ID: 34141109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Pinheiro LR, Gaia BF, Oliveira de Sales MA, Umetsubo OS, Santos Junior O, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul 10; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.