These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

648 related items for PubMed ID: 33378505

  • 1. Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.
    Borda AF, Garfinkle JS, Covell DA, Wang M, Doyle L, Sedgley CM.
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul 01; 90(4):485-490. PubMed ID: 33378505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in adolescents with moderate to severe malocclusions.
    Chou B, Nickel JC, Choi D, Garfinkle JS, Freedman HM, Iwasaki LR.
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Nov 01; 93(6):644-651. PubMed ID: 37407511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.
    Lin E, Julien K, Kesterke M, Buschang PH.
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar 01; 92(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 35168256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment.
    Weir T.
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Mar 01; 62 Suppl 1():58-62. PubMed ID: 28297094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative assessment of the clinical outcomes of clear aligners compared to fixed appliance in class II malocclusion.
    Irsheid R, Godoy LDC, Kuo CL, Metz J, Dolce C, Abu Arqub S.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jul 25; 28(8):445. PubMed ID: 39052179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep 25; 128(3):292-8; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 16168325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Alam MK, Al-Ibrahim HM.
    Int Orthod; 2023 Dec 25; 21(4):100817. PubMed ID: 37837842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Do orthodontic treatments using fixed appliances and clear aligner achieve comparable quality of occlusal contacts?
    Al-Dboush RE, Al-Zawawi E, El-Bialy T.
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec 25; 23(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 36526845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative Assessment of Orthodontic and Aesthetic Outcomes after Orthognathic Surgery with Clear Aligner or Fixed Appliance Therapy.
    Liou YJ, Chen PR, Tsai TY, Lin S, Chou PY, Lo CM, Chen YR.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jul 01; 154(1):162-172. PubMed ID: 37257129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances.
    Rask H, English JD, Colville C, Kasper FK, Gallerano R, Jacob HB.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021 Jul 01; 26(4):e2119360. PubMed ID: 34524380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The efficacy of orthodontic treatments for anterior crowding with Invisalign compared with fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating Index.
    Lanteri V, Farronato G, Lanteri C, Caravita R, Cossellu G.
    Quintessence Int; 2018 Jul 01; 49(7):581-587. PubMed ID: 29881831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures in adults treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a retrospective cohort study.
    Yang T, Jiang L, Sun W, Zhu M, Jiang K, Li H, Lei L.
    Head Face Med; 2023 Jul 17; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 37461116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Possibilities and limitations of treatment with clear aligners. An orientation].
    Doomen RA, Aydin B, Kuitert R.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2018 Oct 17; 125(10):533-540. PubMed ID: 30317374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Jyotirmay, Singh SK, Adarsh K, Kumar A, Gupta AR, Sinha A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jul 01; 22(7):763-768. PubMed ID: 34615781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: A case-control study.
    Christou T, Abarca R, Christou V, Kau CH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar 01; 157(3):357-364. PubMed ID: 32115114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Clear aligner therapy: risks and clinical strategies].
    Zhao ZH.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec 09; 54(12):798-802. PubMed ID: 31874477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies.
    Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan 23; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 30674307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners.
    Hennessy J, Garvey T, Al-Awadhi EA.
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep 23; 86(5):706-12. PubMed ID: 27571371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of oral health status, oral hygiene management behaviours and satisfaction of patients with fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligner: A quasi-experimental design.
    Kim JE, Kim S, Kim DH.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2024 Nov 23; 22(4):939-948. PubMed ID: 38659166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Periodontal and restorative considerations with clear aligner treatment to establish a more favorable restorative environment.
    Boyd RL.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009 Jun 23; 30(5):280-2, 284, 286-8 passim. PubMed ID: 19514262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.