These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 33384489

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study.
    Inamdar MS, Chole DG, Bakle SS, Gandhi NP, Hatte NR, Rao MP.
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 33384489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study.
    Kumar KVKS, Prasad MG, Sandeep RV, Reddy SP, Divya D, Pratyusha K.
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 27403059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An in vivo study.
    Aswathi KK, Rani SP, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali KJ.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 28139476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Prabhakar A, Lokeshwari M, Naik SV, Yavagal C.
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(4):323-329. PubMed ID: 30397377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Volumetric analysis after caries excavation with caries detecting dyes and chemomechanical caries removal agents using 3D scanner-a randomised clinical trial.
    Bastia R, Govind S, Assiry AA, Alessa NA, Kader MA, Adil AH, Karobari MI.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb 01; 24(1):164. PubMed ID: 38302932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study.
    Sahana S, Vasa AA, Geddam D, Reddy VK, Nalluri S, Velagapudi N.
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr 01; 6(Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 27195222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative Microbiological Evaluation after Caries Removal by Various Burs.
    Somani R, Chaudhary R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ.
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019 Apr 01; 12(6):524-527. PubMed ID: 32440068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of Caries Excavation Using Conventional, Smart Bur, Chemomechanical Method and ErCr: YSGG Laser.
    Kini A, Kothari P, Sujith R, Shetty N, Varughese BK, Kasargod SC.
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Jul 01; 16(Suppl 3):S2830-S2832. PubMed ID: 39346219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Polymer Bur, Cera Bur, and Tungsten Carbide Bur in Dentin Caries Excavation of Mandibular Primary Molars: An In vivo Study.
    Thomas S, Duraisamy V, Selvarajan NB, Gainneos RPD, Joybell CC, Gopalan T.
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr 01; 16(Suppl 2):S1442-S1446. PubMed ID: 38882818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs.
    Meller C, Welk A, Zeligowski T, Splieth C.
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Apr 01; 38(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 17694212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal.
    Prabhakar A, Kiran NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul 01; 10(4):26-34. PubMed ID: 19575051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. SEM Analysis of Residual Dentin Surface in Primary Teeth Using Different Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents.
    Thakur R, Patil SDS, Kush A, Madhu K.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017 Jul 01; 41(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 28650784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Novel bioactive caries-detecting dye solution: Cytotoxicity, antimicrobial activity, scanning electron microscope, and stereomicroscopic analysis in diagnosis of dental caries.
    Shashirekha G, Jena A, Mohanty N, Kamilla SK.
    J Conserv Dent; 2020 Jul 01; 23(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 33223647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12-15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial.
    Sontakke P, Jain P, Patil AD, Biswas G, Yadav P, Makkar DK, Jeph V, Sakina BP.
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2019 Jul 01; 16(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 30745918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.