These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 33392737

  • 1. Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.
    Meacock J, Schramm M, Selvanathan S, Currie S, Stocken D, Jayne D, Thomson S.
    Neuroradiology; 2021 Mar; 63(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 33392737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of osseous cervical foraminal stenosis in spinal radiculopathy using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Engel G, Bender YY, Adams LC, Boker SM, Fahlenkamp UL, Wagner M, Diederichs G, Hamm B, Makowski MR.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 30324384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiology Reports Do Not Accurately Portray the Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis.
    Lee Y, Ziad Issa T, Mazmudar AS, Tarawneh OH, Toci GR, Lambrechts MJ, DiDomenico EJ, Kwak D, Becsey AN, Henry TW, Haider AA, Larkin CJ, Kaye ID, Kurd MF, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Schroeder GD.
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Oct 01; 37(8):351-356. PubMed ID: 38490967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.
    Kim W, Ahn KS, Kang CH, Kang WY, Yang KS.
    Clin Imaging; 2017 Oct 01; 43():165-169. PubMed ID: 28334616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.
    Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SY, Oh JB, Riew KD.
    Spine J; 2015 Apr 01; 15(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 25452016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative evaluation for cervical foraminal bony stenosis based on angled sagittal slices along a nerve root on computed tomography.
    Ozaki M, Nishioka K, Kitayama M, Kawaguchi T, Nakao N.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Jan 01; 71():89-92. PubMed ID: 31685289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging.
    Strobel K, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid M, Hodler J, Boos N, Zanetti M.
    Radiology; 2004 Oct 01; 233(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 15317955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessing Foraminal Stenosis in the Cervical Spine: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Surface Reconstruction to Two-Dimensional Modalities.
    Schell A, Rhee JM, Holbrook J, Lenehan E, Park KY.
    Global Spine J; 2017 May 01; 7(3):266-271. PubMed ID: 28660110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.