These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
269 related items for PubMed ID: 33407586
1. Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner. Patriki D, von Felten E, Bakula A, Giannopoulos AA, Kamani CH, Schwyzer M, Messerli M, Benz DC, Gebhard C, Gräni C, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA, Fuchs TA, Buechel RR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jan 07; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 33407586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Disagreement between splenic switch-off and myocardial T1-mapping after caffeine intake. Kuijpers D, van Dijk R, van Assen M, Kaandorp TAM, van Dijkman PRM, Vliegenthart R, van der Harst P, Oudkerk M. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr 07; 34(4):625-632. PubMed ID: 29177579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine cause similar vasodilator effect in patients undergoing stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. García-Baizán A, Millor M, Bartolomé P, Ezponda A, Pueyo JC, Gavira JJ, Bastarrika G. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr 07; 35(4):675-682. PubMed ID: 30426300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography. Everaars H, van Diemen PA, Bom MJ, Schumacher SP, de Winter RW, van de Ven PM, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, Hofman MBM, van der Geest RJ, Götte MJ, van Rossum AC, Nijveldt R, Danad I, Driessen RS, Knaapen P. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul 07; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term impact of myocardial inflammation on quantitative myocardial perfusion-a descriptive PET/MR myocarditis study. Buechel RR, Ciancone D, Bakula A, von Felten E, Schmidt GA, Patriki D, Gräni C, Wahl A, Manka R, Heidecker B, Benz DC, Giannopoulos AA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kaufmann PA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct 07; 50(12):3609-3618. PubMed ID: 37391545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects. Brown LAE, Onciul SC, Broadbent DA, Johnson K, Fent GJ, Foley JRJ, Garg P, Chew PG, Knott K, Dall'Armellina E, Swoboda PP, Xue H, Greenwood JP, Moon JC, Kellman P, Plein S. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul 09; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve Assessed by Gated SPECT with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Detectors Using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: Head-to-Head Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET. Nkoulou R, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kuest SM, Ghadri JR, Stehli J, Fiechter M, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA. J Nucl Med; 2016 Dec 09; 57(12):1887-1892. PubMed ID: 27363834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients with reduced heart rate response to adenosine infusion have low myocardial flow reserve in (13)N-ammonia PET studies. Tomiyama T, Kumita S, Ishihara K, Suda M, Sakurai M, Hakozaki K, Hashimoto H, Takahashi N, Takano H, Kobayashi Y, Kiriyama T, Fukushima Y, Shimizu W. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun 09; 31(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 25846547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Splenic Switch-Off for Determining the Optimal Dosage for Adenosine Stress Cardiac MR in Terms of Stress Effectiveness and Patient Safety. Giusca S, Wolf D, Hofmann N, Hagstotz S, Forschner M, Schueler M, Nunninger P, Kelle S, Korosoglou G. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec 09; 52(6):1732-1742. PubMed ID: 32557923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jácome R, Jiménez M, Romero E, Meave A, Le Meunier L, Dalhbom M, Berman DS, Germano G, Schelbert H. J Nucl Med; 2012 Feb 09; 53(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 22228795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease. Akil S, Hedeer F, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Oddstig J, Hindorf C, Jögi J, Erlinge D, Engblom H. J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec 09; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Karamitsos TD, Leccisotti L, Arnold JR, Recio-Mayoral A, Bhamra-Ariza P, Howells RK, Searle N, Robson MD, Rimoldi OE, Camici PG, Neubauer S, Selvanayagam JB. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan 09; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Hashimoto H, Fukushima Y, Kumita SI, Tomiyama T, Kiriyama T. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug 09; 34(8):1323-1329. PubMed ID: 29556942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of splenic switch off in a tertiary imaging centre: validation and assessment of utility. Hosking A, Koulouroudias M, Zemrak F, Moon JC, Rossi A, Lee A, Barnes MR, Boubertakh R, Pugliese F, Manisty C, Petersen SE. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov 01; 18(11):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 28329392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]