These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

363 related items for PubMed ID: 33416259

  • 1. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Informational Masking Effects of Speech Versus Nonspeech Noise on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Vander Werff KR, Niemczak CE, Morse K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct 04; 64(10):4014-4029. PubMed ID: 34464537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Oct 04; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA, Bidelman GM.
    Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 May 15; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr 15; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.
    Brown VA, Dillman-Hasso NH, Li Z, Ray L, Mamantov E, Van Engen KJ, Strand JF.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul 15; 84(5):1772-1787. PubMed ID: 35474415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.
    Bennett KO, Billings CJ, Molis MR, Leek MR.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul 15; 33(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22367094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA, Stefl AA, Gallun FJ, Billings CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jul 15; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L, Bradlow AR, Dhar S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr 15; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Apr 15; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar 15; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attentional modulation of the early cortical representation of speech signals in informational or energetic masking.
    Zhang C, Lu L, Wu X, Li L.
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug 15; 135():85-95. PubMed ID: 24992572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/.
    Whiting KA, Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun 15; 19(3):218-31. PubMed ID: 9657596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jun 15; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.
    Garcia Lecumberri ML, Cooke M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr 15; 119(4):2445-54. PubMed ID: 16642857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Neural encoding for spatial release from informational masking and its correlation with behavioral metrics.
    Li JY, Wang X, Nie S, Zhu MY, Liu JX, Wei L, Li H, Wang NY, Zhang J.
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Oct 01; 132(4):1265-1277. PubMed ID: 39258777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM, Avivi-Reich M, Schneider BA.
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov 01; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.
    Calandruccio L, Brouwer S, Van Engen KJ, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun 01; 22(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 23800811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.