These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
112 related items for PubMed ID: 33423342
21. Effect of hypnotic suggestion on cognition and craving in smokers. Bollinger JW, Beadling CW, Waters AJ. Addict Behav Rep; 2020 Jun; 11():100220. PubMed ID: 31890851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference. Augustinova M, Clarys D, Spatola N, Ferrand L. Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Placebo-suggestion modulates conflict resolution in the Stroop Task. Magalhães De Saldanha da Gama PA, Slama H, Caspar EA, Gevers W, Cleeremans A. PLoS One; 2013 Apr; 8(10):e75701. PubMed ID: 24130735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Task and information conflicts in the numerical Stroop task. Hershman R, Beckmann L, Henik A. Psychophysiology; 2022 Sep; 59(9):e14057. PubMed ID: 35353908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Suggestion reduces the stroop effect. Raz A, Kirsch I, Pollard J, Nitkin-Kaner Y. Psychol Sci; 2006 Feb; 17(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16466414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Using hypnosis to gain insights into healthy and pathological cognitive functioning. Oakley DA, Halligan PW. Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):328-31. PubMed ID: 20188598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Using suggestion to modulate automatic processes: from Stroop to McGurk and beyond. Lifshitz M, Aubert Bonn N, Fischer A, Kashem IF, Raz A. Cortex; 2013 Feb; 49(2):463-73. PubMed ID: 23040173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals. Raz A, Moreno-Iñiguez M, Martin L, Zhu H. Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 16765063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses. Raz A, Campbell NK. Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 19962911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts. Hershman R, Henik A. Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 31396822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Inhibition in the emotional Hayling task: can hypnotic suggestion enhance cognitive control on a prepotent negative word? Brunel J, Delord S, Mathey S. Cogn Emot; 2024 Jun 18; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38888553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming. Piai V, Roelofs A, van der Meij R. Brain Res; 2012 Apr 23; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Kalanthroff E, Davelaar EJ, Henik A, Goldfarb L, Usher M. Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan 23; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task. Hershman R, Henik A. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct 23; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]