These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1037 related items for PubMed ID: 33433391
1. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study. Sjöberg V, Westergren J, Monnier A, Lo Martire R, Hagströmer M, Äng BO, Vixner L. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan 12; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR, Ng N, Burton NW, Pavey TG, Gilson ND, Brown WJ. J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep 07; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillao A, Timmons S, Barton J, O'Flynn B. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun 19; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site. Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, Shaffer JA, Ma Y, Goldsmith J, Schwartz JE, Davidson KW. BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr 12; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. Mikkelsen MK, Berg-Beckhoff G, Frederiksen P, Horgan G, O'Driscoll R, Palmeira AL, Scott SE, Stubbs J, Heitmann BL, Larsen SC. PLoS One; 2020 Apr 12; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec 18; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH, Ng SH, Paknezhad M, Gauterin A, Koh D, Brown MS, Müller-Riemenschneider F. PLoS One; 2017 Dec 18; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study. Müller AM, Wang NX, Yao J, Tan CS, Low ICC, Lim N, Tan J, Tan A, Müller-Riemenschneider F. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct 02; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Imboden MT, Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Montoye AH. Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul 02; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies. O'Driscoll R, Turicchi J, Beaulieu K, Scott S, Matu J, Deighton K, Finlayson G, Stubbs J. Br J Sports Med; 2020 Mar 02; 54(6):332-340. PubMed ID: 30194221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls. Blondeel A, Demeyer H, Janssens W, Troosters T. PLoS One; 2020 Mar 02; 15(8):e0236676. PubMed ID: 32750073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study. Degroote L, Hamerlinck G, Poels K, Maher C, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandendriessche A, Curtis RG, DeSmet A. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May 19; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study. Mora-Gonzalez J, Gould ZR, Moore CC, Aguiar EJ, Ducharme SW, Schuna JM, Barreira TV, Staudenmayer J, McAvoy CR, Boikova M, Miller TA, Tudor-Locke C. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Sep 08; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 36076265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Chow JJ, Thom JM, Wewege MA, Ward RE, Parmenter BJ. Gait Posture; 2017 Sep 08; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure. Sushames A, Edwards A, Thompson F, McDermott R, Gebel K. PLoS One; 2016 Sep 08; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study. Nelson BW, Allen NB. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar 11; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Ferguson T, Rowlands AV, Olds T, Maher C. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar 27; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDS. Jones D, Crossley K, Dascombe B, Hart HF, Kemp J. Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Aug 27; 13(5):860-870. PubMed ID: 30276018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X. Knaier R, Höchsmann C, Infanger D, Hinrichs T, Schmidt-Trucksäss A. BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb 28; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]