These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V). de Almeida SC, Mendes AP, Kempster GB. J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Özcebe E, Aydinli FE, Tiğrak TK, İncebay Ö, Yilmaz T. J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Hindi. Joshi A, Baheti I, Angadi V. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec 14; 63(12):3974-3981. PubMed ID: 33226868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice. Kondo K, Mizuta M, Kawai Y, Sogami T, Fujimura S, Kojima T, Abe C, Tanaka R, Shiromoto O, Uozumi R, Kishimoto Y, Tateya I, Omori K, Haji T. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec 13; 64(12):4754-4761. PubMed ID: 34752149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders. Nemr K, Simões-Zenari M, de Souza GS, Hachiya A, Tsuji DH. J Voice; 2016 Nov 13; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Mandarin Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and Its Reliability. Chen Z, Fang R, Zhang Y, Ge P, Zhuang P, Chou A, Jiang J. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct 26; 61(10):2451-2457. PubMed ID: 30242389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual Voice Dimensions' Prediction of Overall Dysphonia Severity on Two Auditory-Perceptual Scales. Walden PR, Rau S. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug 17; 65(8):2759-2777. PubMed ID: 35868295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. Uloza V, Petrauskas T, Padervinskis E, Ulozaitė N, Barsties B, Maryn Y. J Voice; 2017 Mar 17; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs. Chaves CR, Campbell M, Côrtes Gama AC. J Voice; 2017 Mar 17; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech. Maryn Y, Kim HT, Kim J. J Voice; 2016 Sep 17; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures. Vaz Freitas S, Melo Pestana P, Almeida V, Ferreira A. J Voice; 2015 May 17; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Mozzanica F, Ginocchio D, Borghi E, Bachmann C, Schindler A. Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013 May 17; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S, Lowit A. J Voice; 2014 Nov 17; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]