These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 33473237

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.
    Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Saraiva Amaral J, Marto CM, Farias J, Alves Pereira D, Ermida J, Banaco Á, Campos Felino A, Caramelo F, Matos S.
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Jun 25; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 35877327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Piezoelectric compared with conventional rotary osteotomy for the prevention of postoperative sequelae and complications after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Badenoch-Jones EK, David M, Lincoln T.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec 25; 54(10):1066-1079. PubMed ID: 27832920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.
    Sharma AK, Gupta A, Pabari HP, Pathak SK, Odedra NH, Beniwal J, Arora KS.
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec 25; 14(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 37661971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis.
    Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar 25; 45(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 26572830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece.
    Srivastava P, Shetty P, Shetty S.
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Sep 25; 9(Suppl 2):S318-S324. PubMed ID: 30294165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.