These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

322 related items for PubMed ID: 33474754

  • 1. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A, Chen YW, Kostagianni A, Finkelman M, Papathanasiou A, Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L, Chen YW, Kostagianni A, Finkelman M, Papathanasiou A, Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings.
    Conejo J, Yoo TH, Atria PJ, Fraiman H, Blatz MB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):475.e1-475.e7. PubMed ID: 38182453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
    Yousef H, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Morton D, Lin WS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
    Chen Y, Li H, Zhai Z, Nakano T, Ishigaki S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Papaspyridakos P, Chen YW, Alshawaf B, Kang K, Finkelman M, Chronopoulos V, Weber HP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts.
    Rutkūnas V, Jegelevičius D, Gedrimienė A, Revilla-León M, Pletkus J, Akulauskas M, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M, Auškalnis L.
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105135. PubMed ID: 38885735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P, Al-Harbi F, El Tantawi M, Mohsen C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. 3D Accuracy of a Conventional Method Versus Three Digital Scanning Strategies for Completely Edentulous Maxillary Implant Impressions.
    Blanco-Plard A, Hernandez A, Pino F, Vargas N, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Elias A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec 12; 38(6):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 38085753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Alsharbaty MHM, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr 12; 28(4):e902-e908. PubMed ID: 29423969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P, Aly NM, Al-Harbi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun 12; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec 12; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P, Aly NM, Al-Harbi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul 12; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Trueness of maxillomandibular relationship in 3D-printed and conventional casts.
    Auškalnis L, Akulauskas M, Osnes C, Revilla-León M, Kernen-Gintautė A, Rutkūnas V.
    J Dent; 2024 Sep 12; 148():105044. PubMed ID: 38710316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in 25 Edentulous Arches: A Laboratory Observational Study.
    Ben Yehuda D, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Sicilia E, Muftu A, Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct 12; 29(8):718-724. PubMed ID: 32648318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, Peng L, Geng W.
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec 10; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.