These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 33491943

  • 1. Systematic review of guidelines to identify recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke.
    Morone G, Palomba A, Martino Cinnera A, Agostini M, Aprile I, Arienti C, Paci M, Casanova E, Marino D, LA Rosa G, Bressi F, Sterzi S, Gandolfi M, Giansanti D, Perrero L, Battistini A, Miccinilli S, Filoni S, Sicari M, Petrozzino S, Solaro CM, Gargano S, Benanti P, Boldrini P, Bonaiuti D, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzoleni S, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Posteraro F, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Straudi S, "CICERONE" Italian Consensus Conference on Robotic in Neurorehabilitation.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Apr; 57(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 33491943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review.
    Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C.
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2017 Dec; 15(12):3049-3091. PubMed ID: 29219877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bilateral robots for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects.
    Sheng B, Zhang Y, Meng W, Deng C, Xie S.
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):587-606. PubMed ID: 27117423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
    Taveggia G, Borboni A, Salvi L, Mulé C, Fogliaresi S, Villafañe JH, Casale R.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 52(6):767-773. PubMed ID: 27406879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation versus physical therapy on subacute stroke patients: A follow-up study.
    Franceschini M, Mazzoleni S, Goffredo M, Pournajaf S, Galafate D, Criscuolo S, Agosti M, Posteraro F.
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Jan; 24(1):194-198. PubMed ID: 31987544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
    Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Pecchioli C, Loreti S, Spedicato A, Meotti M, Mosca R, Speranza G, Cecchi F, Giannarelli G, Padua L, Aprile I.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May 16; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    Jakob I, Kollreider A, Germanotta M, Benetti F, Cruciani A, Padua L, Aprile I.
    PM R; 2018 Sep 16; 10(9 Suppl 2):S189-S197. PubMed ID: 30269805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Stoquart G, Detrembleur C, Jacquemin G, Palumbo S, Frederick A, Lejeune T.
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Sep 16; 62(5):313-320. PubMed ID: 31028900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
    Colombo R, Pisano F, Delconte C, Mazzone A, Grioni G, Castagna M, Bazzini G, Imarisio C, Maggioni G, Pistarini C.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr 16; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Portable robots for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng KC, Wang L, Hsieh C, Wong AM.
    Ann Med; 2024 Dec 16; 56(1):2337735. PubMed ID: 38640459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke.
    Mehrholz J, Pollock A, Pohl M, Kugler J, Elsner B.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jun 30; 17(1):83. PubMed ID: 32605587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review.
    Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C.
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Apr 30; 17(4):520-547. PubMed ID: 30973526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy.
    Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G, Masiero S.
    Biomed Res Int; 2013 Apr 30; 2013():153872. PubMed ID: 24350244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Combined transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in patients with stroke: a systematic review.
    Fonte C, Varalta V, Rocco A, Munari D, Filippetti M, Evangelista E, Modenese A, Smania N, Picelli A.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2021 Apr 30; 39(6):435-446. PubMed ID: 34974446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Impact of initial flexor synergy pattern scores on improving upper extremity function in stroke patients treated with adjunct robotic rehabilitation: A randomized clinical trial.
    Takebayashi T, Takahashi K, Domen K, Hachisuka K.
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2020 Oct 30; 27(7):516-524. PubMed ID: 32151236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.