These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

113 related items for PubMed ID: 3350617

  • 1. DNA patterns and aggressive histopathologic features in 159 patients with cervical carcinoma.
    Strang P, Lindgren A, Frankendal B, Stendahl U.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1988; 7(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 3350617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prospective malignancy grading and flow cytometry DNA distribution in biopsy specimens from invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Willén R, Tropé C, Långström E, Ranstam J, Killander D, Clase L.
    Anticancer Res; 1987; 7(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 3592637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Flow cytometry (FCM) of early radiation response in epidermoid carcinoma of uterine cervix.
    Glasová M, Siracký J, Masák L, Kysela B.
    Neoplasma; 1992; 39(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 1491725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in esophageal cancer. Aneuploidy as an index for highly malignant potential.
    Kaketani K, Saito T, Kobayashi M.
    Cancer; 1989 Aug 15; 64(4):887-91. PubMed ID: 2743280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cervical carcinoma DNA content, S-fraction, and malignancy grading. I. Interrelationships.
    Johnson TS, Adelson MD, Sneige N, Williamson KD, Lee AM, Katz R.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Jan 15; 26(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 3792935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. DNA ploidy, grade, and stage in prognosis of uterine cervical cancer.
    Davis JR, Aristizabal S, Way DL, Weiner SA, Hicks MJ, Hagaman RM.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Jan 15; 32(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 2909446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cytogenetic and cytometric analyses in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Strang P.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1989 Jan 15; 8(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 2651340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Flow cytometric DNA patterns in cervical carcinoma.
    Strang P, Stendahl U, Frankendal B, Lindgren A.
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1986 Jan 15; 25(4-6):249-54. PubMed ID: 3030052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Iraqi patients.
    Garib BT, Al-Ani S, Al-Alwan N, Tillawi IS.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002 Jan 15; 8(2-3):393-403. PubMed ID: 15339129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Heterogeneity of squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity studied by flow cytometry.
    Tytor M, Wingren S, Olofsson J.
    Pathol Res Pract; 1991 Jan 15; 187(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 2027821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Definition of parameters in a histopathologic malignancy grading system.
    Stendahl U, Willén H, Willén R.
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1980 Jan 15; 19(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 6263060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.