These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

585 related items for PubMed ID: 33506455

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T, Pattarapuntakul T, Netinatsunton N, Ovartlarnporn B, Sottisuporn J, Chamroonkul N, Sripongpun P, Jandee S, Kaewdech A, Attasaranya S, Piratvisuth T.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun 24; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y, Xiong D, Zhao Y, Meng Z, Wu X, Jiang Q, Wang Q, Wu D, Zhang S, Feng Y, Yang A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun 24; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Hathorn KE, Madruga-Neto AC, Lee LS, Thompson CC.
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun 24; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Flumignan VK, Najdawai F, Ryou M, Lee LS, Thompson CC.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul 24; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A, Wadhwa V, Singh H, Khan S, Gupta K, Liang H, Hussain I, Vargo J, Jang S, Chahal P, Bhatt A, Siddiki H, Erim T, Sanaka MR.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May 24; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 29; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec 29; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.