These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 33508830

  • 1. Quantification of Posterior Risk Related to Intrapartum FIGO 2015 Criteria for Cardiotocography in the Second Stage of Labor.
    Cavoretto PI, Seidenari A, Amodeo S, Della Gatta AN, Nale R, Ismail YS, Candiani M, Farina A.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33508830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor.
    Ekengård F, Cardell M, Herbst A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4853-4860. PubMed ID: 33406946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring features associated with a clinical diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status.
    Rimsza RR, Frolova AI, Kelly JC, Carter EB, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Sep; 5(9):101068. PubMed ID: 37380056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Types of intrapartum hypoxia in the newborn at term with metabolic acidemia: A retrospective study.
    Descourvieres L, Ghesquiere L, Drumez E, Martin C, Sauvage A, Subtil D, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garabedian C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 36004701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acidemia at birth in the vigorous infant as a trigger incident to assess intrapartum care with regard to CTG patterns.
    Jonsson M, Nordén Lindeberg S, Östlund I, Hanson U.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1094-8. PubMed ID: 23350711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P, Machado AP, Monteiro S, Costa A, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, Ayres-De-Campos D.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Deceleration area and fetal acidemia.
    Martí Gamboa S, Lapresta Moros M, Pascual Mancho J, Lapresta Moros C, Castán Mateo S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Nov; 30(21):2578-2584. PubMed ID: 27819172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Implementation of a revised classification for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring and association to birth outcome: A national cohort study.
    Jonsson M, Söderling J, Ladfors L, Nordström L, Nilsson M, Algovik M, Norman M, Holzmann M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):183-192. PubMed ID: 35092004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of Hypoxic Acidemia in Last 2 Hours of Labour in Low-Risk Women.
    Toomey PC, Oppenheimer L.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Nov; 41(11):1564-1570. PubMed ID: 30885507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The clinical significance of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in twins.
    Dera-Szymanowska A, Polska M, Markwitz W, Moczko J, Horst N, Szymanowski K.
    Ginekol Pol; 2023 Nov; 94(10):839-844. PubMed ID: 36378125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The iPREFACE score is useful for predicting fetal acidemia: A retrospective cohort study of 113 patients who underwent emergency cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status during labor.
    Ito A, Hayata E, Kotaki H, Shimabukuro M, Takano M, Nagasaki S, Nakata M.
    AJOG Glob Rep; 2024 May; 4(2):100343. PubMed ID: 38699222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Correlation between intrapartum CTG findings and interleukin-6 levels in the umbilical cord arterial blood: A prospective cohort study.
    di Pasquo E, Fieni S, Chandraharan E, Dall'Asta A, Morganelli G, Spinelli M, Bettinelli ML, Aloe R, Russo A, Galli L, Perrone S, Ghi T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():128-134. PubMed ID: 38237311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Physiological CTG interpretation: the significance of baseline fetal heart rate changes after the onset of decelerations and associated perinatal outcomes.
    Jia YJ, Chen X, Cui HY, Whelehan V, Archer A, Chandraharan E.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2349-2354. PubMed ID: 31533502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
    Puertas A, Góngora J, Valverde M, Revelles L, Manzanares S, Carrillo MP.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
    Kundu S, Kuehnle E, Schippert C, von Ehr J, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.