These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 33541819

  • 1. Sleeve insert scan body to predict implant placement position by using implant surgical guides: A dental technique.
    Lim JH, Shin SH, Nam NE, Bayarsaikhan E, Shim JS, Kim JE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):827-831. PubMed ID: 33541819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R, Siqueira R, Li J, Saleh I, Meneghetti P, Bezerra F, Wang HL, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessing the accuracy of fabricated implant surgical guides by reconstructing the implant position based on cone beam computed tomography images: A dental technique.
    Zhang R, Li S, Liu Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):267-270. PubMed ID: 34120760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
    Adams CR, Ammoun R, Deeb GR, Bencharit S.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 35257456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of virtually planned and 3D-printed stereolithographic surgical guides from CBCT and digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Shah NP, Khanna A, Pai AR, Sheth VH, Raut SR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 33583616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.
    Guentsch A, An H, Dentino AR.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Apr; 33(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 35148444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
    Kessler A, Le V, Folwaczny M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Nov; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of Different Surgical Guide Designs for Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
    Wu YT, Papaspyridakos P, Kang K, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, De Souza AB.
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct 01; 48(5):351-357. PubMed ID: 34937081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: An in vitro study.
    Liu X, Liu J, Feng H, Pan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar 01; 127(3):453-461. PubMed ID: 33309294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
    Sittikornpaiboon P, Arunjaroensuk S, Kaboosaya B, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug 01; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug 01; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of a novel modified single computed tomography scanning method for assisting dental implant placement: a retrospective observational study.
    Shimizu H, Mino T, Kurosaki Y, Arakawa H, Tokumoto K, Kimura-Ono A, Maekawa K, Kuboki T.
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Nov 02; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 37917412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Sadeghpour M, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar 02; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of a custom two-piece surgical guide for all-on-four dental implant placement: An in vitro study.
    Elnashoukaty HM, ElDakkak S, Abdelhakim A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul 02; 130(1):101.e1-101.e9. PubMed ID: 37230911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kiatkroekkrai P, Takolpuckdee C, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar 02; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.