These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 33542168

  • 1. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
    Franchina A, Stefanelli LV, Maltese F, Mandelaris GA, Vantaggiato A, Pagliarulo M, Pranno N, Brauner E, Angelis F, Carlo SD.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec 14; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
    González Rueda JR, Galparsoro Catalán A, de Paz Hermoso VM, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Pato Mourelo J, Montero Martín J, Hernández Montero S.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar 15; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study.
    Jorba-García A, Ruiz-Romero V, Bara-Casaus JJ, Camps-Font O, Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E.
    J Dent; 2024 Sep 15; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Sep 15; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr 15; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy.
    Grecchi E, Stefanelli LV, Grecchi F, Grivetto F, Franchina A, Pranno N.
    J Dent; 2022 Apr 15; 119():103942. PubMed ID: 34974136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R, Siqueira R, Li J, Saleh I, Meneghetti P, Bezerra F, Wang HL, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb 15; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, Ellingsen JE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Feb 15; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Feb 15; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. CBCT device dependency on the transfer accuracy from computer-aided implantology procedures.
    Dreiseidler T, Tandon D, Kreppel M, Neugebauer J, Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Zöller JE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep 15; 23(9):1089-97. PubMed ID: 22680780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study.
    Struwe M, Leontiev W, Connert T, Kühl S, Filippi A, Herber V, Dagassan-Berndt D.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar 15; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of bicortical mini-implants placement site for maxillary skeletal expansion appliances: an in vitro study.
    Rodríguez Torres P, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Tzironi G, González Menéndez H, Lorrio Castro J, Lobo Galindo AB, Hernández Montero S.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb 11; 23(1):86. PubMed ID: 36774459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan 11; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.
    Stünkel R, Zeller AN, Bohne T, Böhrnsen F, Wedi E, Raschke D, Kauffmann P.
    Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Oct 06; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 36198996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr 06; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study.
    Horsch L, Labis C, Trebing CT, Kronsteiner D, Hilgenfeld T, Rammelsberg P, Schwindling FS.
    J Dent; 2021 Sep 06; 112():103744. PubMed ID: 34252488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Plaster Cast Contact Scan Method to Assess the Accuracy of Full-Arch Computer-Aided Implant Surgery.
    Franchina A, Stefanelli LV, Ferri A, Pellegrino G, Di Carlo S, De Angelis F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Sep 06; 37(4):756-762. PubMed ID: 35904832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.