These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 33579176

  • 1. Peripherally inserted central catheter versus totally implanted venous port for delivering medium- to long-term chemotherapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on propensity score matching.
    Wang K, Zhou Y, Huang N, Lu Z, Zhang X.
    J Vasc Access; 2022 May; 23(3):365-374. PubMed ID: 33579176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.
    Wu O, McCartney E, Heggie R, Germeni E, Paul J, Soulis E, Dillon S, Ryan C, Sim M, Dixon-Hughes J, Agarwal R, Bodenham A, Menne T, Jones B, Moss J.
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jul; 25(47):1-126. PubMed ID: 34318743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy.
    Shao G, Zhou X, Zhang S, Wu S, Dong Y, Dong Z.
    Front Public Health; 2022 Jul; 10():942175. PubMed ID: 35937250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial.
    Moss JG, Wu O, Bodenham AR, Agarwal R, Menne TF, Jones BL, Heggie R, Hill S, Dixon-Hughes J, Soulis E, Germeni E, Dillon S, McCartney E, CAVA trial group.
    Lancet; 2021 Jul 31; 398(10298):403-415. PubMed ID: 34297997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Economic evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheter and other venous access devices: A scoping review.
    Wang K, Zhong J, Huang N, Zhou Y.
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov 31; 21(6):826-837. PubMed ID: 31894710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cost-utility analysis of different venous access devices in breast cancer patients: a decision-based analysis model.
    Chen N, Yang Q, Li YF, Guo Q, Huang Y, Peng JL.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 May 16; 23(1):497. PubMed ID: 37194042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Complication rates of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted ports in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Rieger MJ, Schenkel X, Dedic I, Brunn T, Gnannt R, Hofmann M, de Rougemont O, Stolz SM, Rösler W, Studt JD, Balabanov S, Wicki A, Lorch A, Manz MG, Schwotzer R.
    Int J Cancer; 2023 Oct 01; 153(7):1397-1405. PubMed ID: 37254629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative Complication Rates of 854 Central Venous Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study of Over 169,000 Catheter-Days.
    Cotogni P, Mussa B, Degiorgis C, De Francesco A, Pittiruti M.
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2021 May 01; 45(4):768-776. PubMed ID: 32511768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cost analysis comparison between peripherally inserted central catheters and implanted chest ports in patients with cancer-A health economic evaluation of the PICCPORT trial.
    Taxbro K, Hammarskjöld F, Juhlin D, Hagman H, Bernfort L, Berg S.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2020 Mar 01; 64(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 31721153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
    Taxbro K, Hammarskjöld F, Thelin B, Lewin F, Hagman H, Hanberger H, Berg S.
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun 01; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes of central venous catheters in patients with solid and hematologic neoplasms: an Italian real-world analysis.
    Corti F, Brambilla M, Manglaviti S, Di Vico L, Pisanu MN, Facchinetti C, Dotti KF, Lanocita R, Marchianò A, de Braud F, Ferrari LAM.
    Tumori; 2021 Feb 01; 107(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 32529962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.
    Patel GS, Jain K, Kumar R, Strickland AH, Pellegrini L, Slavotinek J, Eaton M, McLeay W, Price T, Ly M, Ullah S, Koczwara B, Kichenadasse G, Karapetis CS.
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jan 01; 22(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24005884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K, Ali M, Sidloff D, Kenningham RR, Ahmed S.
    J Vasc Access; 2015 Jan 01; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Utilization and Complications of Central Venous Access Devices in Oncology Patients.
    Akhtar N, Lee L.
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan 10; 28(1):367-377. PubMed ID: 33435136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and totally implanted venous access devices as chemotherapy delivery routes in oncology patients: A retrospective cohort study.
    Yun WS, Yang SS.
    Sci Prog; 2021 Jan 10; 104(2):368504211011871. PubMed ID: 33950754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomised phase II trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted catheters versus implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.
    Clatot F, Fontanilles M, Lefebvre L, Lequesne J, Veyret C, Alexandru C, Leheurteur M, Guillemet C, Gouérant S, Petrau C, Théry JC, Rigal O, Moldovan C, Tennevet I, Rastelli O, Poullain A, Savary L, Bubenheim M, Georgescu D, Gouérant J, Gilles-Baray M, Di Fiore F.
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Feb 10; 126():116-124. PubMed ID: 31931269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of three types of central venous catheters in patients with malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy.
    Fang S, Yang J, Song L, Jiang Y, Liu Y.
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2017 Feb 10; 11():1197-1204. PubMed ID: 28744109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters and Hickman™ catheters in patients with intestinal failure receiving home parenteral nutrition. Six-year follow up study.
    Christensen LD, Holst M, Bech LF, Drustrup L, Nygaard L, Skallerup A, Rasmussen HH, Vinter-Jensen L.
    Clin Nutr; 2016 Aug 10; 35(4):912-7. PubMed ID: 26269383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for central venous access devices in breast cancer: A multicenter discrete choice experiment.
    Liu S, Xiang Y, Gu Y, Chen N, Fu P, Wei Y, Zhao P, Li Y, Du C, Mu W, Xia Z, Chen Y.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Apr 10; 152():104695. PubMed ID: 38301304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Versus Central Venous Catheters for in-Hospital Parenteral Nutrition.
    Comas M, Domingo L, Jansana A, Lafuente E, Civit A, García-Pérez L, Lasso de la Vega C, Cots F, Sala M, Castells X.
    J Patient Saf; 2022 Oct 01; 18(7):e1109-e1115. PubMed ID: 35587883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.