These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 33618160

  • 21. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.
    Houserkova D, Prasad SN, Svach I, Kucerova L, Duskova M, Bucil J, Sisola I, Zlamalova N, Svebisova H.
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV).
    Diebold T, Hahn T, Solbach C, Rody A, Balzer JO, Hansmann ML, Marx A, Viana F, Peters J, Jacobi V, Kaufmann M, Vogl TJ.
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 15973139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
    Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E.
    Cancer; 2004 Feb 15; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
    Michel SC, Löw R, Singer G, Otto R, Hohl M, Kubik RA.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep 26; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Prediction of Residual Malignancy After Excisional Biopsy for Breast Cancer With Suspicious Microcalcifications: Comparison of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Park G, Bae K, Hwang IY, Kim JS, Kwon WJ, Bang M.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec 26; 19(6):e753-e758. PubMed ID: 31182403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
    Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug 26; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer detection: An update meta-analysis.
    Dong H, Kang L, Cheng S, Zhang R.
    Thorac Cancer; 2021 Dec 26; 12(23):3201-3207. PubMed ID: 34668649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
    Badan GM, Piato S, Roveda D, de Faria Castro Fleury E.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct 26; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K, Schrading S, Hansen NL, Barabasch A, Kuhl CK.
    Radiology; 2015 Feb 26; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB).
    Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E.
    Ann Oncol; 2004 Mar 26; 15(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 14998847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R, Cao K, Cao M, Li XT, Gao F, Zhang FD, Yu YZ, Sun YS.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun 26; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
    Cheung YC, Tsai HP, Lo YF, Ueng SH, Huang PC, Chen SC.
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr 26; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. An A.I. classifier derived from 4D radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI data: potential to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies.
    Pötsch N, Dietzel M, Kapetas P, Clauser P, Pinker K, Ellmann S, Uder M, Helbich T, Baltzer PAT.
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug 26; 31(8):5866-5876. PubMed ID: 33744990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
    Kikuchi M, Tanino H, Kosaka Y, Sengoku N, Yamashita K, Minatani N, Nishimiya H, Waraya M, Katoh H, Enomoto T, Kajita S, Woodhams R, Watanabe M.
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov 26; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
    Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr 26; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.