These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 33619632

  • 21. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N, Leevailoj C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
    Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Variables affecting the fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.
    Bousnaki M, Chatziparaskeva M, Bakopoulou A, Pissiotis A, Koidis P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):686-692.e8. PubMed ID: 31703922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E, Cilli M, Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M, Ali A, Finkelman M, Weber HP, Zandparsa R.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):184-190.e12. PubMed ID: 26946916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
    Abduo J, Ho G, Centorame A, Chohan S, Park C, Abdouni R, Le P, Ngo C.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B, Alshahrani FA, Kale E, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.