These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


475 related items for PubMed ID: 33641418

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Acetabular revision with impacted irradiated frozen allografts].
    Wang Q, Zhang XL, Jiang Y, Chen YS, Shen H, Shao JJ.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul 15; 48(14):1045-9. PubMed ID: 21055105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X, Appy B, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN.
    Int Orthop; 2017 May 15; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
    Götze C, Sippel C, Wendt G, Steinbeck J.
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003 May 15; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.
    Roessler PP, Jaenisch M, Kuhlmann M, Wacker M, Johannes Wagenhäuser P, Gravius S, Wirtz DC.
    Int Orthop; 2019 Oct 15; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?
    Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Lachiewicz PF, Ryan SP, Wellman SS.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul 15; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
    Te Stroet MA, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 15; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
    de Kam DC, Gardeniers JW, Veth RP, Schreurs BW.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010 Dec 15; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
    Colo E, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov 15; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Cup-on-cup technique: a reliable management solution for severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement.
    Chiarlone F, Cavagnaro L, Zanirato A, Alessio Mazzola M, Lovisolo S, Mosconi L, Felli L, Burastero G.
    Hip Int; 2020 Sep 15; 30(1_suppl):12-18. PubMed ID: 32907429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.