These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

301 related items for PubMed ID: 33647759

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun 01; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 26; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB.
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 26; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Uysal Y, Babus SB, Kose A, Ates F, Biricik S, Erdogan S, Cevik I, Toker I, Ayrik C.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug 26; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 04; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N, Husic-Selimovic A, Srsen N, Prohic D.
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug 04; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 04; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quick SOFA vs Rockall preendoscopy scores for risk assessment in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.
    Bagin V, Tarasov E, Astafyeva M, Nishnevich E, Rudnov V, Prudkov M.
    Int J Emerg Med; 2019 Mar 25; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 31179936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG, Kim SE, Chang BS, Kwak MS, Yoon JY, Cha JM, Shin HP, Lee JI, Kim SH, Han JH, Jeon JW.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec 12; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan 12; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep 12; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.