These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


220 related items for PubMed ID: 33658330

  • 21. Biochanin A improves fibre fermentation by cellulolytic bacteria.
    Harlow BE, Flythe MD, Aiken GE.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 124(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 29112792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Miron J, Ben-Ghedalia D, Morrison M.
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1294-309. PubMed ID: 11417686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Competition between ruminal cellulolytic bacteria for adhesion to cellulose.
    Mosoni P, Fonty G, Gouet P.
    Curr Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 9175559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Polyclonal antibodies inhibit growth of key cellulolytic rumen bacterial species.
    Tondini SM, Mackie RI, McCann JC.
    Front Microbiol; 2023 Jul; 14():1196492. PubMed ID: 37408639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Real-time PCR detection of the effects of protozoa on rumen bacteria in cattle.
    Ozutsumi Y, Tajima K, Takenaka A, Itabashi H.
    Curr Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 52(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 16467991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Hastie PM, Mitchell K, Murray JA.
    Br J Nutr; 2008 Sep; 100(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 18377691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Functional phylotyping approach for assessing intraspecific diversity of Ruminococcus albus within the rumen microbiome.
    Rozman Grinberg I, Yin G, Borovok I, Berg Miller ME, Yeoman CJ, Dassa B, Yu Z, Mizrahi I, Flint HJ, Bayer EA, White BA, Lamed R.
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2015 Jan; 362(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 25673657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of enzymatic and molecular approaches to characterize the cellulolytic microbial ecosystems of the rumen and the cecum.
    Michalet-Doreau B, Fernandez I, Fonty G.
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Mar; 80(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 11890416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the rumen of sheep fed diets varying in type of forage as monitored by real-time PCR and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis.
    Saro C, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD.
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4487-94. PubMed ID: 23100580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.