These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A Prospective Comparison of 18F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE). Anttinen M, Ettala O, Malaspina S, Jambor I, Sandell M, Kajander S, Rinta-Kiikka I, Schildt J, Saukko E, Rautio P, Timonen KL, Matikainen T, Noponen T, Saunavaara J, Löyttyniemi E, Taimen P, Kemppainen J, Dean PB, Blanco Sequeiros R, Aronen HJ, Seppänen M, Boström PJ. Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography? Kulkarni SC, Sundaram PS, Padma S. Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial. Jansen BHE, Bodar YJL, Zwezerijnen GJC, Meijer D, van der Voorn JP, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Wondergem M, Roeleveld TA, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, van Moorselaar RJA, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb; 48(2):509-520. PubMed ID: 32789599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study. Lenis AT, Pooli A, Lec PM, Sadun TY, Johnson DC, Lebacle C, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Czernin J, Reiter RE, Calais J. Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Incremental Impact of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary N and M Staging of Prostate Cancer Prior to Curative-Intent Surgery: a Prospective Clinical Trial in Comparison with mpMRI. Szigeti F, Schweighofer-Zwink G, Meissnitzer M, Hauser-Kronberger C, Hitzl W, Kunit T, Forstner R, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard. Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, Raggi D, Necchi A, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging of neuroendocrine tumours: comparison of [⁶⁸Ga]DOTATOC multiphase PET/CT and whole-body MRI. Schraml C, Schwenzer NF, Sperling O, Aschoff P, Lichy MP, Müller M, Brendle C, Werner MK, Claussen CD, Pfannenberg C. Cancer Imaging; 2013 Mar 05; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 23466785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard. Kuten J, Fahoum I, Savin Z, Shamni O, Gitstein G, Hershkovitz D, Mabjeesh NJ, Yossepowitch O, Mishani E, Even-Sapir E. J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr 05; 61(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 31562225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chow KM, So WZ, Lee HJ, Lee A, Yap DWT, Takwoingi Y, Tay KJ, Tuan J, Thang SP, Lam W, Yuen J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Chen K. Eur Urol; 2023 Jul 05; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenböck SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. JAMA Oncol; 2021 Nov 01; 7(11):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 34529005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary lymph-node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in high-risk prostate cancer: pathologic correlation with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Corona-Montes VE, González-Cuenca E, Fernández-Noyola G, Olarte-Casas MA, Bobadilla-Salazar D, Medrano-Urtecho HM, Asimakopoulos AD. Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug 01; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]