These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
154 related items for PubMed ID: 33762297
1. Rawlsian justice in healthcare: a response to Cox and Fritz. Sarela AI. J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 48(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 33762297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health Justice and Rawls's Theory at Fifty: Will New Thinking about Health and Inequality Influence the Most Influential Account of Justice? Kniess J. Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51(6):44-50. PubMed ID: 34904731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying Rawls to medical cases: an investigation into the usages of analytical philosophy. Shevory TC. J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986 Nov; 10(4):749-64. PubMed ID: 3457860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service. Fritz Z, Cox CL. J Med Ethics; 2020 Dec; 46(12):797-802. PubMed ID: 33028624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Westerstrand S. Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 Oct 09; 30(5):46. PubMed ID: 39384600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing John Rawls's Theory of Justice to Cover Health and Social Determinants of Health. Ekmekci PE, Arda B. Acta Bioeth; 2015 Nov 09; 21(2):227-236. PubMed ID: 27340331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rawls and research on cognitively impaired patients: a reply to Maio. Bell DR. Theor Med Bioeth; 2003 Nov 09; 24(5):381-93; discussion 395-406. PubMed ID: 14760867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Social Change: Toward an Informed and Critical Understanding of Social Justice and the Capabilities Approach in Community Psychology. Munger F, MacLeod T, Loomis C. Am J Community Psychol; 2016 Mar 09; 57(1-2):171-80. PubMed ID: 27217320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justice, health, and healthcare. Daniels N. Am J Bioeth; 2001 Mar 09; 1(2):2-16. PubMed ID: 11951872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. If You're a Rawlsian, How Come You're So Close to Utilitarianism and Intuitionism? A Critique of Daniels's Accountability for Reasonableness. Badano G. Health Care Anal; 2018 Mar 09; 26(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28332130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Response: Freedom from Pain as a Rawlsian Primary Good. James Roberts A. Bioethics; 2016 Nov 09; 30(9):774-775. PubMed ID: 27518927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicting demands on a modern healthcare service: Can Rawlsian justice provide a guiding philosophy for the NHS and other socialized health services? Fritz Z, Cox C. Bioethics; 2019 Jun 09; 33(5):609-616. PubMed ID: 30887550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In defence of our model for just healthcare systems: why an explicit philosophy is needed in addition to the law, and how Scanlon helps derive just policies. Cox CL, Fritz Z. J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun 09; 48(6):416-418. PubMed ID: 34497142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care. Moskop JC. J Med Philos; 1983 Nov 09; 8(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 6655382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Overlapping consensus in pluralist societies: simulating Rawlsian full reflective equilibrium. Lohse R. Synthese; 2024 Nov 09; 203(1):11. PubMed ID: 38144884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Just Society as a Fair Game: John Rawls and Game Theory in the 1950s. Gališanka A. J Hist Ideas; 2017 Nov 09; 78(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 28366891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How Do You Like Your Justice, Bent or Unbent? Moen LJK. Moral Philos Politics; 2023 Oct 09; 10(2):285-297. PubMed ID: 38014360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rawls and Animal Moral Personality. Baldwin G. Animals (Basel); 2023 Apr 03; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37048494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]