These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 3377061

  • 1. Dehydration of hydrogel lenses: environmental influences during normal wear.
    Brennan NA, Efron N, Bruce AS, Duldig DI, Russo NJ.
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Apr; 65(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 3377061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The durability of hydrogel extended-wear contact lenses worn for daily wear by USAF aircrew members.
    Dennis RJ, Hill JR, Ketchum NS.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Jun; 62(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 1859344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses.
    Holden BA, Mertz GW.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Oct; 25(10):1161-7. PubMed ID: 6592160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Water transport in dehydrating hydrogel contact lenses: implications for corneal desiccation.
    Martin DK.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jul; 29(7):857-65. PubMed ID: 7593025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Pritchard N, Fonn D.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jul; 15(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 7667020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hydrogel versus rigid gas permeable lenses for extended wear: criteria and differences.
    Bennett ES.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Jul; 57(7):500-2. PubMed ID: 3462239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers.
    Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, Kinoshita S.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2563-8. PubMed ID: 15277478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Daily disposed hydrogel lenses--a comparison with biweekly replacement.
    Snyder C, Hammack GG.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Mar; 65(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8201166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, Hunt C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 17435513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear.
    Alba-Bueno F, Beltran-Masgoret A, Sanjuan C, Biarnés M, Marín J.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 19181564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pseudomonas keratitis associated with daily wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Schornack MM, Faia LJ, Griepentrog GJ.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18327051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Refractive index and equilibrium water content of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    González-Méijome JM, Lira M, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16390483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.