These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
308 related items for PubMed ID: 33772570
1. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study. Gulnahar Y, Alpan AL. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 May 01; 26(3):e269-e275. PubMed ID: 33772570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction. Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study. Hamza SP, Aslam S, Roshni A, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb 01; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 37272140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Nehme W, Fares Y, Abou-Abbas L. BMC Oral Health; 2021 Aug 11; 21(1):393. PubMed ID: 34380473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z. Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct 11; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary surgery for impacted third molars: A randomised, split-mouth, clinical pilot trial. Demirci A, Bayram F, Dergin G. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2024 Jan 01; 29(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 37992138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis. Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar 01; 45(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 26572830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of kinesio taping with the web strip technique on pain, edema, and trismus after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Yurttutan ME, Sancak KT. Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Sep 01; 23(9):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 32913166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars. Ma Z, Xu G, Yang C, Xie Q, Shen Y, Zhang S. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Saline Irrigation at Different Temperatures Affect Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Impacted Third Molar Surgery: A Clinical Trial. Çanakçi FG, Er N, Duygu G, Tanan Karaca G. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jan 01; 81(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 36116545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep 01; 50(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 22088359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, Russo A, Scully C, Carossa S. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct 01; 72(10):1890-7. PubMed ID: 25234524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]