These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells. Cannon JM, Blythe JG. Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy. Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK. J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula. Noel ML. J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989 Aug; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy. Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH. Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques. Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D. Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears. Lai-Goldman M, Nieberg RK, Mulcahy D, Wiesmeier E. J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting. Reissman SE. J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved yield of endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears in a residency setting. Kivlahan C, Ingram E. J Fam Pract; 1985 Apr; 20(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 3981098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]