These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


119 related items for PubMed ID: 3379366

  • 21. Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS, Rabinovitz S, Recalde A.
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1989 Jul; 10(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 2732111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
    Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Edmonds P.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L, Jordan J.
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Sep; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
    Broso P, Buffetti G, Sacco A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
    Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Fokke HE, Salvatore CM, Schipper ME, Bleker OP.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 8491328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: effect of different techniques in specific fertility states.
    Hamblin JE, Brock CD, Litchfield L, Dias J.
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Mar; 20(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 3973541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB, Jensen LK, Ejersbo D, Hølund B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000 Mar; (3):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10908482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.