These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
207 related items for PubMed ID: 33809695
1. Nasal Morphology and Its Correlation to Craniofacial Morphology in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis. Jankowska A, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar 16; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33809695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nasal profile changes after orthodontic tooth extraction in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patients: A retrospective study. Sadry S, Eusmanaga E, Kayalar E. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct 16; 125(5):101748. PubMed ID: 38190890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables. Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun 16; 23(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 30941649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh. Thomas M, Reddy VD, Lakshmi HV. Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Jun 16; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study. Lopatienė K, Šidlauskas A, Vasiliauskas A, Čečytė L, Švalkauskienė V, Šidlauskas M. Medicina (Kaunas); 2016 Jun 16; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study. Perović TM, Blažej Z, Jovanović I. Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2021 Jun 16; 80(3):657-664. PubMed ID: 32789846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces. Amini F, Razavian ZS, Rakhshan V. Int Orthod; 2016 Mar 16; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Haavikko K. Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun 16; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between Nasolabial Angle and Maxillary Incisors Inclination in 18-25-Year-Old Chhattisgarh Population Using Pre- and Post-Treatment Lateral Cephalograms: A Retrospective Study. Paryani P, Agrawal SS, Chachada A, Jain M, Bothra S, Shrivastava S, Sahni H. Indian J Dent Res; 2023 Oct 01; 34(4):413-416. PubMed ID: 38739823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of nasal profiles in various skeletal patterns. Arshad T, Shaikh A, Fida M. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2013 Oct 01; 25(1-2):31-5. PubMed ID: 25098048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric Soft Tissue Standard and Gender Dimorphism in Nasal Prominence estimated By Holdaway's Analysis in Patients visiting College of Dentistry, Aljouf University. Kundi I. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb 01; 18(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 28174370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A lateral cephalometric analysis of the adult nose. Begg RJ, Harkness M. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Nov 01; 53(11):1268-74; discussion 1274-5. PubMed ID: 7562191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]