These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 3382291

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Echocardiographic and pathologic features of explanted Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position.
    Naqvi TZ, Siegel RJ, Buchbinder NA, Miroshnik S, Saedi G, Trento A, Fishbein MC.
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Dec 15; 84(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 10606116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Commissural dehiscence of Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprostheses. Explant analysis and pathogenesis.
    Nistal JF, Hurlé A, Gutiérrez JA, Mazorra F, Revuelta JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep 15; 110(3):688-95; discussion 695-6. PubMed ID: 7564435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Correlation between malfunction of a bioprosthesis and deformation of a valve stent. Comparison of three different vale models].
    Actis Dato GM, Caimmi P, Di Rosa E, Deorsola L, Aidala E, Punta G, Poletti G, Di Summa M.
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1998 Apr 15; 46(4):97-101. PubMed ID: 9835735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantitative anatomic analysis of "stent creep" of explanted Hancock standard porcine bioprostheses used for cardiac valve replacement.
    Schoen FJ, Schulman LJ, Cohn LH.
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jul 01; 56(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 4014013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A 10-year comparison of mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock porcine bioprostheses.
    Perier P, Deloche A, Chauvaud S, Chachques JC, Relland J, Fabiani JN, Stephan Y, Blondeau P, Carpentier A.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Jul 01; 48(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2764601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [A case report: Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis malfunction due to the stent dehiscence at 17 years after the implantation in the mitral position].
    Hayashi K, Nakano H, Sakamoto T, Okamura H.
    Kyobu Geka; 2000 Jan 01; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 10639799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years.
    Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Allen P, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct 01; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients.
    Pelletier LC, Carrier M, Leclerc Y, Lepage G, deGuise P, Dyrda I.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Mar 01; 47(3):352-61. PubMed ID: 2930300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Wu Y, Wang L, Starr A.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec 01; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
    Eric Jamieson WR, Marchand MA, Pelletier CL, Norton R, Pellerin M, Dubiel TW, Aupart MR, Daenen WJ, Holden MP, David TE, Ryba EA, Anderson WN.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug 01; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan 01; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
    Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Circulation; 1993 Nov 01; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul 01; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.