These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 3385697

  • 1. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
    Kaunitz AM, Masciello A, Ostrowski M, Rovira EZ.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient endometrial sampling.
    Naim NM, Mahdy ZA, Ahmad S, Razi ZR.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 47(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 17355303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
    Manganiello PD, Burrows LJ, Dain BJ, Gonzalez J.
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator.
    Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 168(1 Pt 1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8420348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
    Check JH, Chase JS, Nowroozi K, Wu CH, Chern R.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
    Henig I, Chan P, Tredway DR, Maw GM, Gullett AJ, Cheatwood M.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
    Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
    Hill GA, Herbert CM, Parker RA, Wentz AC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Yang GC, Wan LS.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S, Triratanachat S, Kankeow K, Limpaphayom KK.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of endometrial sampling with the Accurette and Vabra aspirator and uterine curettage.
    Goldberg GL, Tsalacopoulos G, Davey DA.
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Jan 23; 61(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 7058425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
    Rauf R, Shaheen A, Sadia S, Waqar F, Zafar S, Sultana S, Waseem S.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014 Jan 23; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
    Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA.
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug 23; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vacuum curettage by the Vabrar method. A simple procedure for endometrial diagnosis.
    Einerth Y.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982 Aug 23; 61(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 7148413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
    Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov 23; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
    Williams AR, Brechin S, Porter AJ, Warner P, Critchley HO.
    BJOG; 2008 Jul 23; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at 'no-touch' (vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy.
    Madari S, Al-Shabibi N, Papalampros P, Papadimitriou A, Magos A.
    BJOG; 2009 Jan 23; 116(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19087077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Del Priore G, Williams R, Harbatkin CB, Wan LS, Mittal K, Yang GC.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 May 23; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M, Majid MM.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015 May 23; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.