These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 33873218

  • 1. The Relationship between Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Assessments of Temporal Resolution.
    Heydari K, Tahaei AA, Pourbakht A, Haghani H, Nazeri A.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):171-179. PubMed ID: 33873218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE, Bogo R, Berninger E.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Association of auditory steady state responses with perception of temporal modulations and speech in noise.
    Manju V, Gopika KK, Arivudai Nambi PM.
    ISRN Otolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 2014():374035. PubMed ID: 25006511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA, Small SA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Mar; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.
    Dimitrijevic A, Alsamri J, John MS, Purcell D, George S, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Mar; 37(5):e322-35. PubMed ID: 27556365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Air-conduction auditory steady-state response: comparison of interchannel recording using two modulation frequencies.
    Kaf WA, Danesh AA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):696-707. PubMed ID: 19418709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J, Karawani H, Shemesh R, Nageris B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Oct; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auditory steady state response in sound field.
    Hernández-Pérez H, Torres-Fortuny A.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 23176132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The optimal stimulation parameters of the free-field auditory steady-state responses].
    Tufatulin GS.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020 Jun; 85(5):18-23. PubMed ID: 33140928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses.
    Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15937412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with ASSR and PTA in normal-hearing subjects].
    Yang XP, Fan LH, Zhou XR, Zhu GY.
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 24(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 18817031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Amplitude modulation detection and temporal modulation cutoff frequency in normal hearing infants.
    Walker BA, Gerhards CM, Werner LA, Horn DL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3667. PubMed ID: 31255105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Sininger YS, Hunter LL, Hayes D, Roush PA, Uhler KM.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jun; 39(6):1207-1223. PubMed ID: 29624540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Depth matters - Towards finding an objective neurophysiological measure of behavioral amplitude modulation detection based on neural threshold determination.
    Waechter SM, Lopez Valdes A, Simoes-Franklin C, Viani L, Reilly RB.
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():13-22. PubMed ID: 29291949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ipsilateral and contralateral recordings of the 40-Hz auditory steady state response (ASSR): Which one is better?
    Zakaria MN, Jalaei B, Sidek D.
    B-ENT; 2016 Mar; 12(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 27097394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S, Jafari Z, Haghani H, Talebi H.
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA, Smyth A, Leon G.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Dec; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Normal ipsilateral/contralateral asymmetries in infant multiple auditory steady-state responses to air- and bone-conduction stimuli.
    Small SA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 18595185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.