These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

294 related items for PubMed ID: 33875247

  • 1. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
    Elsayed A, Yazigi C, Kern M, Chaar MS.
    Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of the restorative material on the mechanical behavior of screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns.
    Yazigi C, Kern M, Chaar MS, Libecki W, Elsayed A.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103988. PubMed ID: 32799134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Failure resistance of single-implant crowns assembled from polyetheretherketone and lithium disilicate abutments and different crown materials after artificial aging.
    Elsayed A, Farrag G, Chaar MS, Yazigi C, Abdelnabi N, Kern M.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2024 Oct 15; 27(3):273-280. PubMed ID: 37417447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A, Wille S, Al-Akhali M, Kern M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan 15; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
    Atsü SS, Aksan ME, Bulut AC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jan 15; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
    Nouh I, Kern M, Sabet AE, Aboelfadl AK, Hamdy AM, Chaar MS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan 15; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
    Barbosa-Júnior SA, Pereira GKR, Dapieve KS, Machado PS, Valandro LF, Schuh C, Consani RLX, Bacchi A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020 Jan 15; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
    Donmez MB, Diken Turksayar AA, Olcay EO, Sahmali SM.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr 15; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of Different CAD/CAM Crown Materials on the Fracture of Custom-Made Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments After Artificial Aging.
    Elsayed A, Farrag G, Chaar MS, Abdelnabi N, Kern M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr 15; 32(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 30677119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
    Cárdenas R, Sánchez D, Euán R, Flores AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun 15; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
    Pitta J, Hicklin SP, Fehmer V, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC, Sailer I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jun 15; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D, Sabet A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul 15; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E, Velioğlu E, Çömlekoğlu ME, Çömlekoğlu MD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Jul 15; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
    Emam M, Eldimeery A, Salah T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Jul 15; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
    Mitsias M, Koutayas SO, Wolfart S, Kern M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun 15; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
    Roberts EE, Bailey CW, Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL, Vandewalle KS.
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug 15; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the marginal adaptation and debonding strength of two types of CAD-CAM implant-supported cement-retained crowns.
    Ramzy NA, Azer AS, Khamis MM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec 05; 23(1):967. PubMed ID: 38053146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
    Martínez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Bartolomé JF, Pradíes G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Dec 05; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.