These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 33915536

  • 1. Intraoperative Correction of Cochlear Implant Electrode Translocation.
    Morrel WG, Manzoor NF, Dawant BM, Noble JH, Labadie RF.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(2):104-108. PubMed ID: 33915536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrode Translocations in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes: Audiological and Electrophysiological Outcome.
    Liebscher T, Mewes A, Hoppe U, Hornung J, Brademann G, Hey M.
    Z Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 31(3):265-275. PubMed ID: 32620321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Morrel WG, Holder JT, Dawant BM, Noble JH, Labadie RF.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 162(5):718-724. PubMed ID: 32093543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prolonged Insertion Time Reduces Translocation Rate of a Precurved Electrode Array in Cochlear Implantation.
    van der Jagt AMA, Briaire JJ, Boehringer S, Verbist BM, Frijns JHM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr 01; 43(4):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 35213473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A, Mack M, Baghi M, Gstoettner WK, Adunka OF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 01; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relations Between Scalar Shift and Insertion Depth in Human Cochlear Implantation.
    Zelener F, Majdani O, Roemer A, Lexow GJ, Giesemann A, Lenarz T, Warnecke A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb 01; 41(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 31789806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
    Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS, Dawant BM, Labadie RF.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov 01; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dynamic Behavior and Insertional Forces of a Precurved Electrode Using the Pull-Back Technique in a Fresh Microdissected Cochlea.
    Smetak MR, Riojas KE, Whittenbarger N, Noble JH, Labadie RF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr 01; 44(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 36728107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hildenbrand T, Rauch AK, Ketterer MC.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar 01; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode: Melbourne Experience and Comparison With the Contour Perimodiolar Electrode.
    Shaul C, Weder S, Tari S, Gerard JM, O'Leary SJ, Briggs RJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jun 01; 41(5):639-643. PubMed ID: 32150026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Atraumatic Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Pre-Curved Electrode Array by a Robot-Automated Alignment with the Coiling Direction of the Scala Tympani.
    Torres R, Hochet B, Daoudi H, Carré F, Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Nguyen Y.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022 Jun 01; 27(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 34284383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD, Carlson ML, Lane JI, Driscoll CL.
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec 01; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H, Thomeer HGXM.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun 01; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spread of the intracochlear electrical field: Implications for assessing electrode array location in cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S, Sivonen V, Koivisto J, Aarnisalo A, Sinkkonen ST.
    Hear Res; 2023 Jul 01; 434():108790. PubMed ID: 37196460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preliminary Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Insertion Techniques.
    Labadie RF, Noble JH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug 01; 39(7):922-928. PubMed ID: 29995013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC, Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Hassepass F, Wesarg T, Laszig R, Beck R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb 01; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using a Precurved Electrode Array Inserted With an External Sheath.
    Nassiri AM, Yawn RJ, Holder JT, Dwyer RT, O'Malley MR, Bennett ML, Labadie RF, Rivas A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jan 01; 41(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 31746820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Identification of anatomic risk factors for scalar translocation in cochlear implant patients.
    Eisenhut F, Lang S, Taha L, Hoelter P, Wiesmueller M, Uder M, Iro H, Doerfler A, Hornung J.
    Z Med Phys; 2021 Aug 01; 31(3):254-264. PubMed ID: 33648794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.