These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
167 related items for PubMed ID: 33963262
1. Design aspects of vaginal applicators that influence acceptance among target users. Bakke AJ, Zaveri T, Higgins MJ, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Sci Rep; 2021 May 07; 11(1):9802. PubMed ID: 33963262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualitative exploration of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence acceptability of semisoft vaginal suppositories. Zaveri T, Powell KA, Guthrie KM, Bakke AJ, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. BMC Womens Health; 2018 Oct 20; 18(1):170. PubMed ID: 30342510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceptability and performance of a nonwoven device for vaginal drug delivery among women and their male partners in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Hart CW, Joanis C, Hartmann M, Milford C, Smit J, Beksinska M, Rambally-Greener L, Pienaar J, Mabude Z, Butterworth GAM, Sokal D, Jenkins D. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Oct 20; 24(5):390-398. PubMed ID: 31517545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Shape of vaginal suppositories affects willingness-to-try and preference. Li B, Zaveri T, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Antiviral Res; 2013 Mar 20; 97(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 23276592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. User-identified gel characteristics: a qualitative exploration of perceived product efficacy of topical vaginal microbicides. Morrow KM, Underhill K, van den Berg JJ, Vargas S, Rosen RK, Katz DF. Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct 20; 43(7):1459-67. PubMed ID: 24452632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, comparative safety study of a prefilled plastic and user-filled paper applicator with candidate microbicide tenofovir 1% gel. Cohen JA, Brache V, Foster J, Cochon L, Callahan M, Schwartz J. Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Jun 20; 40(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 23677021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptability of a non-woven device for vaginal drug delivery of microbicides or other active agents. Joanis CL, Hart CW. AIDS Behav; 2010 Jun 20; 14(3):600-6. PubMed ID: 20049522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Use and Acceptability of the SILCS Diaphragm Compared to Vaginal Applicators for Vaginal Gel Delivery. Beksinska M, Greener R, Smit J, Maphumulo B, Mphili N, Kilbourne-Brook M, Coffey PS. AIDS Behav; 2018 Jan 20; 22(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 28993940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The acceptability of an investigational vaginal microbicide, PRO 2000 Gel, among women in a phase I clinical trial. Morrow K, Rosen R, Richter L, Emans A, Forbes A, Day J, Morar N, Maslankowski L, Profy AT, Kelly C, Abdool Karim SS, Mayer KH. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Sep 20; 12(7):655-66. PubMed ID: 14583106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of 3 approaches for assessing adherence to vaginal gel application in clinical trials. van der Straten A, Cheng H, Mensch B, Friedland B, Katzen L, Littlefield S, Buckley N, Espinoza L, Keller MJ, Herold BC, Einstein MH. Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Dec 20; 40(12):950-6. PubMed ID: 24220357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferences and practices related to vaginal lubrication: implications for microbicide acceptability and clinical testing. Braunstein S, van de Wijgert J. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Jun 20; 14(5):424-33. PubMed ID: 15989415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Set it and forget it": women's perceptions and opinions of long-acting topical vaginal gels. van den Berg JJ, Rosen RK, Bregman DE, Thompson LA, Jensen KM, Kiser PF, Katz DF, Buckheit K, Buckheit RW, Morrow KM. AIDS Behav; 2014 May 20; 18(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24248674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]