These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 33990992

  • 1. On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard.
    Schofield MR, Maze MJ, Crump JA, Rubach MP, Galloway R, Sharples KJ.
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep 30; 40(22):4751-4763. PubMed ID: 33990992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH, Baerenbold O, Keogh RH, Bradley J.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar 10; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M, Oberski DL, Reitsma JB, Vermunt JK, Moons KG, de Groot JA.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun 10; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
    Wang C, Lin X, Nelson KP.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr 10; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Rejoinder to "On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard".
    Schofield MR, Maze MJ, Crump JA, Rubach MP, Galloway RL, Sharples KJ.
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep 30; 40(22):4770-4771. PubMed ID: 34515367
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of Bayesian Hui-Walter and logistic regression latent class models to estimate diagnostic test characteristics with simulated data.
    Ni H, Koop G, Klugkist I, Nielen M.
    Prev Vet Med; 2023 Aug 30; 217():105972. PubMed ID: 37499309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Latent Class Analysis: Insights about design and analysis of schistosomiasis diagnostic studies.
    Koukounari A, Jamil H, Erosheva E, Shiff C, Moustaki I.
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb 30; 15(2):e0009042. PubMed ID: 33539357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J, Huynh M.
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct 30; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Latent class models for Echinococcus multilocularis diagnosis in foxes in Switzerland in the absence of a gold standard.
    Otero-Abad B, Armua-Fernandez MT, Deplazes P, Torgerson PR, Hartnack S.
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Dec 19; 10(1):612. PubMed ID: 29258612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J, Boelaert M, Lesaffre E.
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep 30; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
    Cheung A, Dufour S, Jones G, Kostoulas P, Stevenson MA, Singanallur NB, Firestone SM.
    Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun 30; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Commentary on "On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold-standard" by Schofield et al.
    Dendukuri N.
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep 30; 40(22):4766-4769. PubMed ID: 34515365
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N, Jørgensen E, Højsgaard S.
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr 30; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bayesian latent class models for identifying canine visceral leishmaniosis using diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Ozanne MV, Brown GD, Scorza BM, Mahachi K, Toepp AJ, Petersen CA.
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2022 Mar 30; 16(3):e0010236. PubMed ID: 35286301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard using an Anaplasma marginale field data set].
    Müllner P, Dreher UM, Meli ML, Lutz H, Hofman-Lehmann R, Doherr MG.
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005 Mar 30; 118(9-10):416-22. PubMed ID: 16206931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two-phase Bayesian latent class analysis to assess diagnostic test performance in the absence of a gold standard: COVID-19 serological assays as a proof of concept.
    Camirand Lemyre F, Honfo SH, Caya C, Cheng MP, Colwill K, Corsini R, Gingras AC, Jassem A, Krajden M, Márquez AC, Mazer BD, McLennan M, Renaud C, Yansouni CP, Papenburg J, Lewin A.
    Vox Sang; 2023 Dec 30; 118(12):1069-1077. PubMed ID: 37850270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.