These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
122 related items for PubMed ID: 3404938
1. [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination]. Aulhorn E, Köst G. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 3404938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry]. Schiefer U, Pfau U, Selbmann HK, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of Rauschfeld examinations with the Tübingen electronic campimeter. A comparison with current perimetry procedures]. Schiefer U, Köst G, Aulhorn E. Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 87(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 2272584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes]. Aulhorn E, Schiefer U, Herzau V. Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma]. Schiefer U, Ulrich WD, Ulrich C, Wilhelm H, Aulhorn E. Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions. Bachmann G, Fahle M. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [A new white-noise campimeter]. Schiefer U, Stercken-Sorrenti G. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 202(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 8464208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Modified technics for the examination of the central visual field]. Richard G. Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990 Jan; 87(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 2376381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modern perimetry: automatic or manual?]. Etienne R, Etienne A, Sellem E. J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983 Jan; 6(11):927-32. PubMed ID: 6672066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia. Watanabe K, Shinoda K, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y, Ohde H. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 17184719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Objective assessment of visual field defects using multifocal electroretinography]. Kretschmann U, Gendo K, Wilhelm H, Schiefer U, Hettesheimer H, Zrenner E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jan; 212(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 9541894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures. Vandeveer MR, Norden LC. J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Noise field findings in 24 patients with coronary heart disease]. Erb C, Hettesheimer H, Stübiger N, Voelker W. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Nov; 217(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 11146825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)]. Pradines F, Delbosc B, Royer J. J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985 Nov; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma]. Gramer E, Roesen B, Siebert M. Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Nov; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]