These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
131 related items for PubMed ID: 34052070
1. Homologous amniotic membrane as a dural substitute in decompressive craniectomies. Marton E, Giordan E, Gallinaro P, Curzi C, Trojan D, Paolin A, Guerriero A, Rossi S, Bendini M, Longatti P, Canova G. J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():412-421. PubMed ID: 34052070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Decompressive Craniectomies with Subsequent Cranioplasties in the Presence of Collagen Matrix Dural Substitute and Polytetrafluoroethylene as an Adhesion Preventative Material. Pierson M, Birinyi PV, Bhimireddy S, Coppens JR. World Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 86():153-60. PubMed ID: 26433096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute as adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Vakis A, Koutentakis D, Karabetsos D, Kalostos G. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2006 Dec; 108(8):798-802. PubMed ID: 16368186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane use in emergent craniectomies shows minimal dural adhesions. Endicott L, Ehresman J, Tettelbach W, Forsyth A, Lee BS. J Wound Care; 2023 Oct 02; 32(10):634-640. PubMed ID: 37830838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale Behind the Use of Double-Layer Polypropylene Patch (G-patch) Dural Substitute During Decompressive Craniectomy as an Adhesion Preventive Material for Subsequent Cranioplasty with Special Reference to Flap Elevation Time. Pathrose Kamalabai R, Nagar M, Chandran R, Mohammed Haneefa Suharanbeevi S, Bhanu Prabhakar R, Peethambaran A, Mallika Dhanapalan S, Jain S, Sharma S. World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar 02; 111():e105-e112. PubMed ID: 29233748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety of the nonabsorbable dural substitute in decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. Huang YH, Lee TC, Chen WF, Wang YM. J Trauma; 2011 Sep 02; 71(3):533-7. PubMed ID: 21768912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Waterjet dissection in pediatric cranioplasty. Tschan CA, Hermann EJ, Wagner W, Krauss JK, Oertel JM. J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2010 Mar 02; 5(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20192640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy. Sun H, Wang H, Diao Y, Tu Y, Li X, Zhao W, Ren J, Zhang S. Brain Behav; 2018 May 02; 8(5):e00907. PubMed ID: 29761002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biocompatibility evaluation of dura mater substitutes in an animal model. Barbolt TA, Odin M, Léger M, Kangas L, Hoiste J, Liu SH. Neurol Res; 2001 Dec 02; 23(8):813-20. PubMed ID: 11760872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preservation of the temporal muscle during the frontotemporoparietal approach for decompressive craniectomy: technical note. Missori P, Paolini S, Ciappetta P, Seferi A, Domenicucci M. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Jul 02; 155(7):1335-9. PubMed ID: 23605253 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of silicone elastomer sheet as another option of adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Lee CH, Cho DS, Jin SC, Kim SH, Park DB. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2007 Oct 02; 109(8):667-71. PubMed ID: 17640798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]