These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 34053887

  • 1. An evaluation of resectability among endoscopic treatment methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors <10 mm.
    Toriyama K, Yamamura T, Nakamura M, Maeda K, Sawada T, Mizutani Y, Ishikawa E, Furukawa K, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, Kawashima H, Fujishiro M.
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jun; 22(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 34053887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
    Park SB, Kim HW, Kang DH, Choi CW, Kim SJ, Nam HS.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug 21; 21(31):9387-93. PubMed ID: 26309365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Advantages of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device compared to conventional EMR and ESD.
    Kamigaichi Y, Yamashita K, Oka S, Tamari H, Shimohara Y, Nishimura T, Inagaki K, Okamoto Y, Tanaka H, Yuge R, Urabe Y, Arihiro K, Tanaka S.
    DEN Open; 2022 Apr 21; 2(1):e35. PubMed ID: 35310732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
    Lee WH, Kim SW, Lim CH, Kim JS, Cho YK, Lee IS, Choi MG, Choi KY.
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov 21; 27(11):4313-8. PubMed ID: 23807754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chen J, Ye J, Zheng X, Chen J.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar 21; 28(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 38445925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang HP, Wu W, Yang S, Lin J.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 21; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
    Cheung DY, Choi SK, Kim HK, Kim SS, Chae HS, Seo KJ, Cho YS.
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun 21; 29(6):1500-5. PubMed ID: 25277474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
    Pan J, Zhang X, Shi Y, Pei Q.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep 21; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Zhang J, Liu M, Li H, Chen J, Su H, Zheng J, Lin G, Lei X.
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb 21; 42(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28750769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.